Hi Individual,

Probably because it was too dumb-dumb to respond to.

For example, you're obviously confusing immigrants with refugees.

Currently, Bangla Desh would be taking in vastly more Muslim refugees, Rohingya, than any Western country. And before you make any racist remarks about Rohingya, just remember that their parents and grandparents fought against the Japanese (and against Japan's Buddhist Burmese toadies) during the War, when their part of Burma was known as Arakan.

Then you ask an impossible question: "What percentage of the refugees remain in those countries to build a new life ?" How could any survey find that out - presuming you do actually mean 'refugees' and not 'immigrants'. After what period of time do you mean by 'remain' before they go somewhere else, if that's what you mean? Where else might they go ? And what would you interpret as 'a new life' ?

It might pay to turn your brain on for once.

Joe

loudmouth2,
since you're so up to speed with Muslim Refugees/migrants, you might want to answer this as well,
How many refugees from Muslim countries are genuine refugees rather than silent invaders ? I'm asking you because I came across an article from the Telegraaf some time ago in the Netherlands which stated this; Let's be clear: Going on holiday in the country you fled ' because you are threatened with death ' is fraud and therefore not possible in our country!! Share this if you agree that they but have to stay in their country!
Have you witnessed this happening in Australia ?
Also, think that refugees are mainly the result of people with similar to your mentality infiltrating politics !

Individual,

Again, dumb-arse, you ask impossible questions: how on earth would anybody know ?

As they say, a fool can ask questions that nobody can answer. You've proven that in spades.

First, you would have to differentiate 'refugees' from 'immigrants'.

Then you would have to differentiate refugees from, say, South Sudan, where life is pretty dangerous if you're in the wrong 'tribe' - from refugees from, say, Lebanon where life is bloody grim but not necessarily life-threatening in the same way.

Then you would have to interview them all, perhaps put them on a 'truth drug' first, to get their genine motivations for coming here. Good luck with that.

Certainly, in those publicised cases in which 'refugees' go back to their home-country for holidays, there should be - and probably is - prompt review of their situation. I should hope so.

Joe

Hi Bronwyn,

Have you not heard of "The Good Nazi" Albert Speer? Well, for years Speer was portrayed by some as the good bloke among Hitler's inner circle. I supposed when compared to say Heinrich Himmler, Speer might appear in a rather favourable light. The only crime Speer was reasonable for was the brutal deaths of tens of thousands of people in forced labour. See there are "good" Nazi's as LEGO will tell you.

ask questions that nobody can answer.
loudmouth2,
Your reply warrants my favourite saying that "those with no retort resort to ridicule & insult".
What happened to the Link-providing brigade ? Lost for explanations ? Typical !

To individual.

if "the usual suspects" have not bothered to respond to your post, perhaps it was because it was not worth responding too?

Try writing 350 words beginning with "The reason why I think that all races are equal is because..."