The Forum > Article Comments > Common sense: quarantine is for sick people > Comments
Common sense: quarantine is for sick people : Comments
By David Pellowe, published 6/8/2020At no stage did we ever think lock down was a sustainable measure. We were told we only had to flatten the curve.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
"it is not my responsibility if the guy who takes my money at the pizza shop gets the virus from me"
Or course it is.
Because if you have the virus you should be in quarantined, not being down at the pizza shop.
You even stated such: "Quarantining of sick people must be strictly enforced."
What were you thinking when you wrote that?
were you planning on contradicting yourself?
YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR OWN ACTIONS IN PUTTING OTHERS AT RISK OF HARM,
Also
'YOU HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO YOURSELF TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM HARM'
"Everyone else must maintain basic physical distancing, hand hygiene and cough/sneeze etiquette, but otherwise be allowed natural freedoms of assembly, movement and trade/commerce."
No, I don't support that anymore.
They had theirr chance to do the right thing, they are not taking things seriously and they are putting the entire nation at risk.
Sure you can point the finger at government for not getting things exactly right, but you personally are arguing for things that will increase the risk of harm to others like you are God and hold the ultimate decision of life and death yourself.
Who do you think you are?
Ultimately all the people in Victoria need to take a look in the mirror if they want someone to blame.
"For everyone else with a morbidity risk if infected no higher than a bad flu year, it should be life as normal with some sensible precautions."
Maybe you should have a look at some of the stories of people that DIDN'T die, they're not healthy, its not a common flu.