Bazz,

"those objectors" you mention, have shown their hand by not countering with a credible explanation to challenge this new research.
I am pleased to read this because it once more vindicates me in not accepting something at face value, or because we have some loud, rude, lewd, claytons experts pushing a very convenient PC agenda, all to make themselves look good because they want to appear backing the "cool" but ignorant losers with nothing to show for their irrelevant lives and lifestyles.
This type of activism gives them as much cred as tyring to push a bar of "fools gold" as the real thing.
A good example.

Dear Hasbeen,

You have once again furnished a laugh, this time with;

“think children are the font of all wisdom, but some of us are a bit more intelligent than that. Thank god for Trump”

Trump is the very epitome of a child and as for you considering yourself a bit more intelligent that those kids who are standing up for action on climate change I've got news for you old cock, not in a month of bloody Sundays is a climate denier like yourself within a bull's roar of any of them.

Dear Bazz,

You write;

"scientists at a Finish University and at a Japanese university the presentation of papers on the effect of the sun"

Good lord are you really trotting this out again? Come on mate, this has been utterly debunked and really shouldn't be seeing the light ever again.

Surely you must have something new for us after all these years.

Hey Bazz,
Back before I started being facetious on this topic;

I said number 1 cause is solar output, number 2 is earths orbit and number 3 (distant 3) is humans.

Is what your talking about the Maunder Minimum stuff?

"The Maunder Minimum, also known as the "prolonged sunspot minimum", is the name used for the period around 1645 to 1715 during which sunspots became exceedingly rare, as was then noted by solar observers. The term was introduced after John A. Eddy published a landmark 1976 paper in Science."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum

This is the stuff I remember hearing about when to listened to radio shows that I don't listen to much anymore.

I argued that if humans have the peri reis maps then surely human have lived through climate change;
And that we human need to be the masters of our own environments no matter what happens not the other way around.

SR, you know, I have witnessed your ignorant, arrogant rhetoric for some time, and your behaviour is by far way worse than what you accuse me of.
Your attitude is so overwhelmingly "holy than thou" that even a priest would complain, which is what I am considering, if you continue with your attitude.
WTF makes you think your better than those you demean?
The simple fact is that it is you who is lacking, in many things, including in relativity.
You have no gauge as to the level of relativity a comment or topic has.
You blindly comment, without due care or concern for the truth, only the facts, and then you contrive a truth from the facts, even though there is no correlation.
Ah well I guess every forum has one, and your lucky enough to be it.
What IT is exactly, I'm not allowed to say, but the other commentors have suggestions, I'm sure.

Dear Armchair Critic,

I ask this question often but rarely get a decent answer, what physical property of CO2 do you want me to ignore that would allow me to dismiss that increasing the concentration of this important greenhouse gas will have no impact of global temperatures?