The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Shredding asylum: the arrest of Julian Assange > Comments

Shredding asylum: the arrest of Julian Assange : Comments

By Binoy Kampmark, published 15/4/2019

The pursuit of Assange was 'because he has exposed wrongdoing by US administrations and their military forces.'

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All
Alright, this has gone too far.

You know the term 'useful idiot' means?
It means people who will spout total crap and support the wrong team without actually looking at the facts or themselves even knowing what they're even on about.

"The wikilinks documents were conspicuous by the absence of any real bad exposures.
If there had been any, there would have been headlines everywhere."

- Can't even spell it right -

Wikileaks didn't release the CIA's Vault 7 hacking tools?
If you know the basis of those tools you'd know they can also fabricate the evidence against Assange you idiot.

Do you people understand the basis of governance in the United States of America?

It's administered under the US constitution.
The US government does not hold unlimited power against its own people.
The US constitution is a CONTRACT between the government and the people.
The US constitution does not grant powers to government, but stipulates the 'limits of government'.
The Bill of Rights recognises RIGHTS enshrined in law to the people.

Now take all this in you morons;
And understand that in the US, in regards to 'the contract between government and the people';
When government oversteps it's boundaries and does not govern within what is stipulated in the constitution, then the contract is broken.
It loses legitimacy to govern.

Snowden showed breaches of the Fourth Amendment in mass surveillance of US citizens.
"...the people have a right 'to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.'

This is the law of the land.
And the people have a right to remove a tyrannical government under the provisions of the Second Amendment.

And just so you know, 'A well-regulated militia':
Well-regulated in those times meant 'gunsights' or 'accuracy in firearms'...

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.

You idiots should be forced to learn some facts before you have opinions and advertise your intellectual laziness.
Many do more harm than good.

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=8746&page=0#280674
Posted by Armchair Critic, Monday, 22 April 2019 4:52:20 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"Assange inciting Americans to commit crimes under American laws."

Where exactly did you get this from or do you just make this shite up?
What don't you state facts instead of talking in riddles?
I know some about the Jabbr conversations allegedly between Manning and Assange, there's no evidence it was even Assange that Manning was actually talking to, and he even admitted that himself (or herself or whatever he/she is).

You can hang him out to dry all you want when he's safely back on our soil.
You people are intent on making sure he never comes home.

Why is it that effing no-one possesses real ethics?
Posted by Armchair Critic, Monday, 22 April 2019 5:01:54 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What a bunch of weak minded jellyfish this nations citizens has become.
- Pathetic grovelling sock puppets beholden to foreign interests -

And to think you could be bought with lies and narrative so easily.

"He's a shite smearer"
"Oh well that's it then, send him to the gallows"

Sell out a fellow citizen without anyone even supporting him having the right to defend himself?

He'll never be allowed a fair trial do you realise this;
IS ANYONE HERE AUSTRALIAN?
He won't be allowed to defend himself in open court.
- They'll say its a matter of national security -

I feel sorry for Julian Assange being born Aussie.
Sorry for all the rest of you that would lick America's balls.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Monday, 22 April 2019 5:48:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well said AC, Well said.

I know, sometimes one does get fed up with the whinie PC crowd. These people are being led by the nose by criminals who don't want their secret evil doings exposed.

Australia has had it's fair share of evil Secrets over the last 100 years too. That's why the 30 year rule & the sealed for ever Documents.
Posted by Jayb, Monday, 22 April 2019 8:31:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
WIKILEAKS THREATENS COURT ACTION - ATTEMPTING TO CENSOR JOURNALISTS' FREEDOM OF SPEECH

In a move to prevent real journalists from doing to Wikileaks what Wikileaks does every day to democratic governments.
____________________________________

Reported January 7, 2019 http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/wikileaks-emails-journalists-with-97-false-and-defamatory-claims-to-avoid-in-reporting-on-founder-julian-assange/

Wikileaks emailed journalists with a list of around 100 “false and defamatory” statements about its founder/publisher Julian Assange after claiming efforts to defame him had “reached a new nadir”.

It said the number of “false and defamatory” claims made against Assange had “accelerated” since his internet access at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he has lived for more than six years, was cut off last year.

This rise was “perhaps because of an incorrect view that Mr Assange, due to his grave personal circumstances, can no longer defend his reputation”, it said in the email sent out to journalists.

Before listing 97 “false and defamatory” claims about Assange and Wikileaks itself, the email concluded: “The purpose of this list is to aid the honest and accurate and to put the dishonest and inaccurate on notice.”

It is believed that the list originally contained 140 claims, but the version published by Wikileaks today had some sections taken out.

[Wikileaks'] email was originally marked as “NOT FOR PUBLICATION” but was later made public by Wikileaks after being leaked.
Posted by plantagenet, Monday, 22 April 2019 10:00:37 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy