The Forum > Article Comments > Islamophobia in Australia: the response of the academy > Comments
Islamophobia in Australia: the response of the academy : Comments
By Jake Lynch, published 20/3/2019Researchers should be able to furnish us with evidence about where Islamophobia 'comes from'; what it consists of; how it is promulgated and spread, by whom and for what ends.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All
Posted by Loudmouth, Thursday, 21 March 2019 11:33:51 AM
| |
@Foxy, Wednesday, 20 March 2019 12:59:22 PM
An absolutely perfect post Foxy, in my opinion. Division. That's the game they are playing in the western world today to tear it apart. Who would do such a thing and why? Look no further than the Marxist socialists - the Left. Everyone left of centre (Scott Morrison and his Liberal bed-wetters included, all the way to the communist Greens in Australia) around the world are active in creating animosity and division within society. Their goal, when they have achieved world discord, disruption, disharmony and chaos is to have the answer, which is simply one world socialism; the United Nations and their "sustainability" agendas. Marxism is about human destruction. Here's a quote from a book written by the late Reverend Richard Wurmbrand, who studied the works and writings of Karl Marx, he writes of Marx - "In his poem "Human Pride," Marx admits that his aim is not to improve the world or to reform or revolutionize it, but simply to ruin it and to enjoy its being ruined: With disdain I will throw my gauntlet Full in the face of the world, And see the collapse of this pygmy giant Whose fall will not stifle my ardour. Then will I wander godlike and victorious Through the ruins of the world And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator." So that's who and why there is and will continue to be, as you eloquently wrote, "...more division, more demonisation, setting groups one against the other." Great stuff Foxy, you know the problem. Now, just work out exactly who it is that is really doing it and why. I've given you my take on it. Good on you for writing your post. Thanks. Posted by voxUnius, Thursday, 21 March 2019 12:24:20 PM
| |
come on Joe you are normally a straight shooter. Don't give me this embroyo deceit. That's exactly what the nazis did when wanting to dehumanise Jews. Have you checked waiting times for adoption lately. And no its not the women's body being butchered its the babies life. And yes under law its the woman's choice to kill her baby. You know what they say about the law especially when formed by godless and cowardly degenerates.
Posted by runner, Thursday, 21 March 2019 12:41:46 PM
| |
calwest,
I'm familiar with the Chinese proverb. We do think too small, like the frog at the bottom of the well. He thinks the sky is only as big as the top of the well, if he surfaced he'd have an entirely different view. He'd see the bigger picture. Still frogs have it made - they get to eat what bugs them. :-) You gave all your links to us from "Breitbart." I'm sure that you're not aware that this site is a questionable source based on extreme views and the publications of numerous false claims. They constantly promote propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing of credible information. A complete lack of transparency and a deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence. http://mediabiasfactcheck.com/breitbart/ Posted by Foxy, Thursday, 21 March 2019 1:28:12 PM
| |
Foxy: You gave all your links to us from "Breitbart." I'm sure that you're not aware that this site is a questionable source based on extreme views and the publications of numerous false claims.
Yet, you are also guilty of doing the same, in quoting Left Wing Sites at times. Left Wing sites that are even more questionable in their extremist views. One should look at all sites then sort out the Chaff from the Wheat. Remember the 80/20 rule. It applies both ways. Refusing to even look at a site because you suspect it might be from a view that you don't support is like closing an eye & a half to enjoy the scenery. Posted by Jayb, Thursday, 21 March 2019 3:29:31 PM
| |
Jayb.,
Sorry your argument doesn't wash. You're going to have to do better than that. My links come from a variety of reputable sources. Whether you agree with them or not is irrelevant. However breitbart is a notoriously disreputable, discredited source as the mediabias fact-check proved. Posted by Foxy, Thursday, 21 March 2019 3:52:47 PM
|
Slightly off topic, but would you advocate that all fathers of embryos should be identified and required to financially support mother and child until the child is eighteen ? And/or that fathers should make more use of their rights to be stay-at-home parents ?
Otherwise, it's solely a woman's choice.
Cheers,
Joe