The Forum > Article Comments > Cynicism about Jesus as an Easter 'treat' > Comments
Cynicism about Jesus as an Easter 'treat' : Comments
By Spencer Gear, published 4/4/2018Don't be so ridiculous as to expect Australian secular people to support the original meaning of Easter. We are into chocolate and not that religious stuff!
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
"King Henry VIII presided over the burning of witches at the rate of 3.25 PA. John Calvin is in good company!" was your statement.
That's a poisoning the well fallacy. See: http://www.softschools.com/examples/fallacies/poisoning_the_well_examples/501/
You engaged in this erroneous reasoning by providing negative information about Calvin and the burning of witches. Then you associated this burning of witches with King Henry VIII's doing the same thing. Negative information about Calvin was presented to try to discredit the argument by association with the King's same kinds of actions.
However, introducing this topic had nothing whatsoever to do with the article's thrust of examination of Jesus' resurrection, so in addition you committed a red herring.
So that we can have a rational conversation, I recommend that you quit the use of logical fallacies.