David Singer

Herein you deal with the Nephilim and the Arcon Invasion force, identified by six fingers and three rows of teeth. And they being the intelligentsia of the forward force.

The next wave of misfits, present with cone heads and over-large eye sockets.

Hi Nick,

Yes I concede that the ABC map showed Palestine as supporting the law that a rapist could absolve himself by marrying his victim, presumably with their families' consent. Her consent didn't - and doesn't now in 2017 - matter a toss. I Suppose the pseudo-Left is quite comfortable with that, including its feminist auxiliary wing. As a feminist, I'm not. But if it floats your boat .....

The point is, Nick, (find a six-year-old who can explain it to you) that women have rights. Their rights, especially their most fundamental rights - the rights for their very bodies not to be violated, to be raped. i.e. without their consent. I know, I know, the pseudo-left (except perhaps some of its women out the back making the tea and coffee, the scones and Anzacs) know that this is just a bourgeois illusion: get used to it, baby.

No

A six year old female has rights? What like the right to be a child bride of "moral" man, speaking for God?

Then presumably with the consent of a "moral" and God fearing family? Has the right, on her 12th birthday, to consummate her "moral" marriage to a "moral" man purporting to speak for God!? ALLEGEDLY!

So Child rape was and remains acceptable in some communities if the perpetrator marries his victim? So sayth the Lord?

Those folk who cannot, will not see something horribly wrong, with that satanic scenario need horse whipping!

A God of love would never ever permit such a scenario, nor would a NORMAL human father!

And if a map with a missing colour code? Has brought this front and centre as a confronting issue, far outweighing the original contention? Then it has served a holy purpose?
Alan B.

Alan,

"A six year old female has rights?" Who, yes, I'm sorry if that upsets you.

"What like the right to be a child bride of "moral" man, speaking for God?" No, that's a manifestation of a backward society, in 207, even though it may have been common around the world in more benighted times. Sorry again, if that disappoints you.

Sorry, I'm a bit touchy about this: I had/have an Aboriginal friend to whom this happened, barely forty years ago. It's probably still common in peasant societies, i.e. as a means to alleviate the tension between families in fractious societies. But it appears hat it has never been legal invite modern state of Israel, even though its neighbouring countries still support this negation of women's rights. I apologise yet again if that enrages you, that countries whose politics you support, exhibit some of the worst features of reactionary backwardness, in 2017.

If the ABC had shown this on its map, say, colouring all countries in the region which had never recognised this vile practice as legal, all would be forgiven. But it might have lost a bit of support from the reactionary and opportunistic 'Left'.

Joe

Loudmouth
not a good day for you ? Problems with reading the Englisi ?
Joe get a b... white texta , click the b... map and colour the tiny sliver white . Take a photo ( why?...) and hammer it onto your monitor with dyna bolts.

#Toni Lavis

Poor little moppet. Great at dishing it out but can't cop it.

Don't answer my question. Your silence condemns you.

#Geoff, #Emperor, #Alan B, #mikk:

I ask each of you to answer the same question #Toni has wimped on:
"Does the map appearing in my article accurately identify and label the countries that are shown on the map?

Just a "YES" or "NO"

#nicknamenick

You appear to have answered "YES" to my above question.

Please confirm your "YES" answer so there is no doubt.

#diver dan

You state:
"You demean yourself by discussing anything that requires an intellegent response, that rides above the inellect of a fourteen YO, with this lot."

Regrettably these particular people turn up to comment whenever OLO publishes an article of mine - not to debate the contents of the articles or dispute any facts in my articles.

Rather these individuals choose to demonise Israel and Jews and employ ad hominem attacks on myself personally in a pathetic attempt to discredit my expressed viewpoint and destroy my credit and reputation.

With the possible exception of #Toni Lavis they all use anonymity to hide their identities. Even #Toni's name could be fictitious. An address supplied by #Toni could help clear up this query.

Look at any of my articles and you will see the same conduct repeated over and over again.

I won't back away from exposing their agenda.

Thanks for expressing your opinion on the level of their intellect. Maybe they could even be that age or younger. The way anonymity works - one never knows for sure.