The Forum > Article Comments > What it means to vote 'No' > Comments
What it means to vote 'No' : Comments
By Mitchell Barrington, published 31/10/2017Yet manyof us simultaneously hold beliefs about how others’ private lives ought to conform to our standards.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
The ugly chicks get more action than the pretty ones because they put out, a lot.
TL: Really? What's their secret?
Weak minds. Don't you listen?
AJ: but I bet I would have gotten more action in my single days had that been possible.
Oh Yeah! I got hit on a lot by dirty old men.
AB: We used to believe that it was okay to keep coloured folk as slaves, given their dark skin was, according to some religious philosophies, the mark of Cain, who would be punished forever though his descendants
Introducing null argument. Stick to the one subject Alan.
AB: We don't get to choose our sex nor our sexual orientation. How many posting here, CHOOSE to be heterosexual? Or did we just accept our biological norms, as the hand nature dealt, along with our gender opposite bias or orientation?
Most of us I'd say. It was just natural that we did.
AB: Or did we just accept our biological norms, as the hand nature dealt, along with our gender opposite bias or orientation?
Yep, that's what happened. Yes a few people were born that way & others, because of mental health or early introduction by dirty old men, chose to go against their natural instincts.
AB: the simple minded would believe so!
It's not the simple minded that believe so, it's the simple minded that choose so.
AB: Were no better than animals and an act of bestiality to have a conjugal relationship with them. And on and on.
Well if you want to go that way Alan that's you choice. Not for me though. That'll be the next big thing after Gay Marriage. Won't it? Equal Rights to marry Children & your Goat. Go for it Alan & Tony.