An interesting quote ... "Denial begins to look like psychosis."

Also "... We’re seeing wildfires in Greenland, for heaven’s sake. Famously soggy Seattle has just gone through a record 54 consecutive days (and counting) without rain."

And " ... The assessment makes for particularly gloomy reading in South Florida, where rising waters already plague our ritziest zip codes."

Plus " ... On Wednesday, researchers from the University of Florida published findings in the journal Geophysical Research Letters that sea levels along the southeast Atlantic coast, south of Cape Hatteras down to South Florida, are rising six times faster than the global averages. So if sea level rise is bad elsewhere, it’s going to be hell in Miami."

From:

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/fred-grimm/article166587642.html

the flea refers us to a liar, who says :” Evidence for a changing climate abounds, from the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the oceans,”.
By this he means climate change as fraudulently defined by the fraud promoters’ definition, meaning human caused climate change, so the statement is a base lie, typical of the dishonest material to which the flea refers us. Science is useless to him, as none supports the fraud which he fails in his attempt to promote.
The flea’s liar also refers us back to the nonsense deceptively referred to by the flea as “science”, published by the New York Times and endorsed to the effect, “not to be copied distributed or cited.
This is the flea’s “science”, in a document which states that under no circumstances is it to be treated as science, any more than an ignoramus like the flea should be treated seriously. He has not yet grasped the concept of science and shows every indication that he never will.

Leo

Your first comment relates to what a major Report has stated ... ” Evidence for a changing climate abounds, from the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the oceans,”. There were 450 scientists from a number of countries who wrote the paper that my reference referred too. Thousands of published research articles in peer reviewed Journals support the views expressed in the mega Report.

An intelligent person whose mind is not clouded by ideology would want to know what evidence you have that climate science is a fraud. Lindzen and Tol must have been committing fraud when they were taking part in IPCC deliberations.

Rather than negative sophistry where is your empirical evidence? Physics and Chemistry and the Laws of Thermodynamics do not belong in the "science" you peddle, Leo.

If Fourier (1820s), Foote, Tyndall (1850s) and other pioneers of climate science were alive today they would have a huge laugh at your expense.