The Forum > Article Comments > South Australia’s energy plan gives national regulators another headache > Comments
South Australia’s energy plan gives national regulators another headache : Comments
By Jeffrey Sommerfeld, published 15/3/2017But an interstate scheme cannot be fixed by the unilateral actions of one state government – in this case, it is likely to be worsened.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
One of the criticisms of the SA system was that the windfarms were not
"stiff"enough or had enough momentum to enable them to sync to the interconnector.
The battery would only be needed for perhaps 10 minutes or so until
everything was up and running.
However upgrading the Snowy scheme is a different thing all together.
It would be a very valuable addition. It could be brought into action
if the wind suddenly dropped anywhere and might even be useful when
the whole east coast has a month like we have had here with no or
little solar power. Also it could supply for weeks. Even at night
it could be topped up when demand was low.
The people on the Insiders were raving on this morning showing their
ignorance of what it is all about. This is typical of almost all the
commentary that is presented to us.
They all agree that natural gas is a transition fuel but never
suggest what might be used when it runs out.
Doog still has not suggested might be used.
Lots of airy fairy schemes some of which might just work but someone
has to put a lot of money up and will want to put it into something they know works.
power