The Forum > Article Comments > South Australia’s energy plan gives national regulators another headache > Comments
South Australia’s energy plan gives national regulators another headache : Comments
By Jeffrey Sommerfeld, published 15/3/2017But an interstate scheme cannot be fixed by the unilateral actions of one state government – in this case, it is likely to be worsened.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
"Over the past few days, the world has gone gaga about Mr Musk’s plan to ‘solve’ South Australia’s energy crisis.
Musk tweeted:
‘Tesla will get the system installed and working 100 days from contract signature or it is free.’
According to ABC News:
‘In response to South Australia’s power problems, Tesla has been talking about a battery array capable of storing somewhere between 100 and 300MWh. While that’s a measure of storage, the actual output of these batteries isn’t clear.’
Sounds great. Then you look at the facts.
According to Australian energy regulator, the…erm…Australian Energy Regulator (AER), Australia’s current electricity capacity stands at a touch under 45,000 megawatts.
So if Mr Musk’s grand plan involves adding 100 to 300 megawatts to the capacity (we assume he’s talking about storage capacity), this number appears to be a rather small drop in the ocean.
And if we’re talking about output, according to the AER, Australia consumes an average of 22,000 megawatts per hour. So again, the 100–300 MWh is hardly significant.
As a further comparison, the Snowy Hydro scheme, among its various assets (which includes hydro and gas), has 5,500 MW of capacity."
Another white elephant.