Killarney

Your political ideology consists of threatening people with prison and rape to force them to obey your social and sexual opinions, and you have the gall to accuse *me* of bullying, for peaceably and verbally challenging your rape and violence culture? That is clownish hypocrisy.

You think it's okay to threaten people with prison and rape to force them to pretend that women are the same as, or equal to men, when you know this is not factually true? Yes? Correct? Or you renounce the political platform of equal opportunity and equal pay? Which?

And you also believe it's okay to threaten people with prison and rape to force them to fund special and exclusive privileges for women? Yes? Or you renounce your bigotted sexist advocacy of laws forcing people to pay for female privileges? Which?

And you think it's okay to kill a partially-born child? Yes? No? If so, why not a born child? If not, on what principle do you decide which human beings it's okay to kill, and which not?

Don't want to answer my questions to defend your bigotted sexist hypocrisy, do you?

And you think it's okay for anyone to kill you if your life is inconvenient for them or causes any health issue, including stress? Yes? Correct? No you're contradicting yourself because you know you're wrong? Which?

"Writing posts about how women/feminists want to take, take, take everything and leave men with nothing goes beyond opinion or fact"

I asked you to SPECIFY any sexism or bigotry on my part. You haven't done so.

I didn't do that so you're either being dishonest or ignorant. Which is it?

You agree with special exclusive sexist privileges for women because they have a vagina, yes? Correct? Or you renounce political feminism? Which?

The fact that you can't defend your ideology is because it's factually, logically, and ethically wrong, and you know it, which is why you refuse to answer my questions. You know perfectly well they totally disprove your bigotted anti-human belief system and rape culture.

//You think it's okay to threaten people with prison and rape//

Sorry to butt in, and I know Killarney is annoying and all, but at exactly what point did she threaten to imprison or rape anybody?

Just curious.

Tony
Oh, so it's voluntary, is it? None of the policies and laws that Killarney advocates, bullying people into sacrificing their values for the sake of sexist female privileges and double standards, are to be enforceable or enforced? Is that what you're saying, Tony? Killarney?

[Deleted for abuse.]

JKJ:

"If not, on what principle do you decide which human beings it's okay to kill, and which not?"

On what principle do you decide what a human being is?

phanto

Your bigotry about the march is almost on a level with JKJ. And as with JKJ, your post is so full of weird and rubbery logic, it's impossible to respond appropriately.

Whatever interpretation you choose to take, the fact remains that the march was far and away the largest one-day protest in US history and one of the largest in world history. Political scientists put the number at approximately 4 million in the US alone, with over 670 marches drawing another half million protestors worldwide. Over 400 organisations took part, from many different political and social justice perspectives.

And all of this was conceived, organised and came together within a timescale of only 6 weeks!

No matter how determined the MSM, alternative media and MRA viral network kept setting and resetting the tone to portray the march as problematic, disorganised and conflicted, the enormity of its success speaks for itself.

Trying to argue that an event of such magnitude and symbolism was put together by a bunch of stupid incompetents who should have cared much more about what people like you might think of them, well, what on earth does someone say to that?

You often put up interesting arguments on OLO, phanto. This is NOT one of them.

I'm done with this thread. Nothing more to add