The Forum > Article Comments > How far would you really go for the Syrians? > Comments
How far would you really go for the Syrians? : Comments
By Marieke Jacobs, published 21/12/2016The harsh reality is that millions of Syrians simply won't be able to live in Syria in the foreseeable future. Which means they will have to live elsewhere.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
-
- All
Posted by Hasbeen, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 11:14:59 AM
| |
The link between climate change contributing to the Syrian War has been documented in various respected publications http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/03/150302-syria-war-climate-change-drought/
Posted by perespective123, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 11:29:56 AM
| |
perspective123,
Oh, please. Give us a break. Your "various respected publications" list is National Geographic? The publishing company which has pushed the global warming hoax through its magazines and television channels, no doubt to increase readers and viewers? In fact, every assertion about the effects of climate change in that article is qualified by "may". And when we look at the actual assertions in the article you link, we find speculative statements about a drought "worsened by a warming climate" (how much worse?) and that "changes in climate may affect human conflict" (or maybe not) according to an academic who has "studied the role of climate change in violence" but did not participate in the new study. He's from UCal at Berkely. Berkely! The study authors "acknowledge that many factors led to Syria's uprising, including corrupt leadership, inequality, massive population growth, and the government's inability to curb human suffering." So why would National Geographic lead with the highly dubious claim about climate change, when any or all of the factors above were obviously far more influential? Must be another TV special coming up. Next you'll be quoting Tim Flannery. Posted by calwest, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 12:54:03 PM
| |
How far would I go to help the Syrians?
As far as the TV and radio to turn off the evening news, and the dozens of daily news updates, so that I don't have to listen to lies about Syria. As far as walking past the newspaper sections in supermarkets, so that I don't have to read lies about Syria (or waste my $2). The author obviously doesn't want to go to the trouble of stepping outside her little information bubble and learn some REAL facts about Syria instead of regurgitating MSM propaganda. That's going WAY too far. Posted by Killarney, Wednesday, 21 December 2016 6:34:06 PM
| |
I have become more affirmed in my belief that we should abandon the
Middle East to its own devices. We, the western non moslem countries, have intervened numerous time to try to bring some order to the area. It was done to suit our interests as well for humanitarian reasons. The Yazadis and the victims of ISIS in recent times brought us in. All those lives and resources were spent for no result. People often charge that it is all about oil. Well no matter what we do the Middle East will always beg to sell us oil. They cannot survive without the sales of oil. They will never stop the war between themselves as they both wish to conquer Rome and do not want to share the spoils. Currently the Sunnis appear to be the keenest to invade Europe. We really have nothing to gain by getting involved in further conflict in the area. Just let them get on with it as there is simply nothing we can do about it. Currently the war between Shia (Iran, Syria, Iraq, Hezbollah) and Sunni (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Eremites) is well under way and the war in Yemen and Syria is just in the warm up phase. There are signs that an invasion of Bahrain and the eastern provinces of Saudi Arabia by Iran is on the cards and a wrong word somewhere could start it. While they fight among themselves they will use up the manpower and wealth they might otherwise apply against the west. The only time we might have to act is if Pakistan deploys a nuclear weapon into the Middle East. All in all our best course is to let them get on with it. It is inevitable. contd Posted by Bazz, Sunday, 25 December 2016 9:22:45 PM
| |
They are genitically bound to their tribes and together with their
religion it has resulted in the Middle East mess that no one except those who live there can resolve. They have chosen to structure their society the way it is and they will resist to the death to keep it that way. Unless they finally get the message that they must have an enlightenment and reformation experience of their own then there is nothing the rest of the world can do for them. Genetically we must keep them in their own territory and not introduce their damaged genome into our countries. A first step is to convince them that Allah was wrong when he said it was OK to marry their cousins, so it became normal practise so as to keep the land and wealth in the family. The Immans would be horrified. It is tough medicine but no one else has come up with any other solution than war war war. Unfortunately that makes them happy as their religion tells them that war is the way that Rome will be overcome and submit to Islam. Posted by Bazz, Sunday, 25 December 2016 9:34:03 PM
|
The very last thing anyone should consider is letting any of these people into their country.
The best thing anyone could do for the planet & themselves would be to donate a dozen short range nuclear armed cruise missiles to each side, & get it finished.