As for your "97 per cent" figure, billyd, wrong again. That has been discredited and refuted a million times by now, as a simple Google search would have shown you. I know it's difficult for a dunce, but do try to keep up.

Here's a sample: http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/#11b3ff6e7187

As I said earlier, you are impervious to facts. I'm guessing facts make your head hurt.

Ah, so as well as a poor historian, Calwest is also a denier, not unexpected.

But really, Calwest, posting a link to that well known 'climate scientist' Alex Epstein is as funny as it gets. This is someone who makes a living from advocating the use of fossil fuels, a WRITER, surely you could have done better than that? Try again.

Back again, donkey, still with no science.
Your link was to an article full of lies and dishonesty, but no science, just like yourself.
Besides the baseles lies about human caused warming, with no science to support the assertions, it even throws in the lie about "acidification" of oceans. Well done, donkey, not a skerrick of truth in the whole article.
You use the scurrilous word “denier” when you have no science to deny, just lies.

Still hurting Leo? NASA not good enough for you? Too much science for you, confused?

What is so pleasant, from my point of view, is that the world cares not a fig what you think or believe, your blathering is irrelevant as the world will act on MMGW and there's nothing you and your fellow deniers can do about it. (Cue smug grin)

Just as an aside Leo, here is a critique of your quoted hero, Bob Carter .... https://skepticalscience.com/bob-carters-climate-counter-consensus-alternate-reality.html

Another monkey making a living from fools like you and Calwest.

Of course, donkey, you were unaware that the deceptively named skeptical science, run by the failed cartoonist John Cook is a climate fraud promotion site, never taken seriously for any of its assertions on science. Some of his supporters say that his failed paper asserting 97% support by climate scientists for the human caused global warming lie was a mistake, and not the attempted fraud it obviously was.
He will not post any comment on the site which sets out the truth, so the comments section is fraud supporting nonsense, not truthful comment.
Your dishonesty is entrenched, donkey.
I post Robert Carter’s science here, because it is truthful and his science is unassailable.
If Cook had any science to disprove it, he should post the science instead of baselessly criticizing Carter, in the puerile and ridiculous way that he has, asserting a “Carter Reality”. Because fraud promoters have no science to back their assertions, they attack Carter, the accomplished scientist who gave evidence on climate to the United States Senate, and gave expert evidence in the Court case which demolished Gore’s lying video.He has shown that fraud promoters, like yourself, have no science to validate their lies, just as you have demonstrated, donkey, being reduced to refer to the disingenuous, fraudulent Skeptical Science as a reference.
Read Carter's book, "Climate, the Counter Consensus".