Back again, donkey?
Brushing aside an ineffective troll like you does not hurt.
I felt only satisfaction.

You can't answer my question though, can you? Which PROVES you are wrong. If only we could post photos, I would show you my self-satisfied smirk.

billyd, you are an ignorant moron, impervious to fact.

Your comments about global warming and CO2 emissions show the entire world that you know nothing. You are merely a posturer.

Similarly, you know nothing about the US electoral system: the electoral college determines the presidency, based on population distribution in each state. That's how it works. That is why Donald Trump is president-elect. That is why Hitlery is not. Moron.

The answer to the donkey’s stupid, and falsely premised question is “It will never happen”. There is no science to show a measurable human effect on climate, so the question is nonsense.
Here is what a climate scientist says:” To summarise, the indirect evidence advanced for human-caused climate change is all equally consistent with a natural origin. Since the establishment of the IPCC in 1988 several thousand scientists have spent more than US$50 billion looking for evidence of human-caused warming without avail. No direct evidence exists for a worrisome magnitude or rate for human-caused global climate change over the last fifty years.”
http://www.quadrant.org.au/magazine/issue/2009/4/a-new-policy-direction-for-climate-change

This is why the donkey fails to refer to any science.
Name calling , and stupid questions are his only resource, as it is with any climate fraud promoter.

Oh dear Calwest, in your futile rush to disprove your ignorant tag you totally misrepresent my intent. The electoral college brings nothing to the election of president, which should be a straight vote. Three million more people voted for Clinton than Trump, showing what a complete undemocratic shambles it is. Even Trump said so, until it suited him.

Poor old Leo, accuses me of name calling now, you couldn't make this up!

Let me give YOU a quote, from NASA .... "Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities, and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position."

But, of course, they are all wrong, and little Leo is right. What that means is, for every three quotes from poor Leo, there are 97 counter quotes.

But, I'll tell you what Leo, I've had enough fun with you, so I'll leave you with a link, and allow you to have the last word.

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Have fun Leo, baa baa baa!

billyd, you are becoming an ever greater embarrassment to yourself.

The electoral college "brings nothing to the election of a president, which should be a straight vote," you say. That's an opinion and a very ill-informed one at that.

Your opinion means absolutely nothing. The role of the electoral college is defined in the US Constitution, which takes precedence over your puerile mewlings. The US Constitution sets out the role, functions and powers of the electoral college and your opinions about what "should" be are juvenile and moronic.

Do try to deal with reality, there's a good little boy.