The Forum > Article Comments > Education minister stubbornly oversees safe schools information blackout > Comments
Education minister stubbornly oversees safe schools information blackout : Comments
By Greg Donnelly, published 16/12/2016Up until early July this year mums and dads could go to the Safe Schools Coalition Australia website and see if the school they sent their children to was a participant in the program.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
Posted by Armchair Critic, Sunday, 18 December 2016 5:04:23 AM
| |
We have actually been presented with a war between homosexuals and the normal.
Most will ignore the reality for a while, but then will appear the likes of Roz Ward, who will inadvertently tell the wrong truth. If we are to consider the safety and welfare of the "different" among us, subverting the minds of the young and the normal in a mass educational system, seems counter intuitive. Creating divisions in society for the supposed welfare of a two percent micro minority, has become a war on normal society: on its traditions of longstanding acceptance of children with abnormal sexual orientation. The vast majority of society have a tolerance towards this particular abnormality among children, without the forced mind altering need for subversive programs foisted by the state, onto the tolerant majority and their children. Posted by diver dan, Sunday, 18 December 2016 7:37:24 AM
| |
More information found on the web:
http://www.theconversation.com/safe-schools-review-findings-experts-respond-56425 Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 18 December 2016 8:10:46 AM
| |
Why do gay radicals and LW Progressives want to sexualise children before they even enter puberty?
Why do they push an agenda in which sexes are interchangeable and sexuality fluid? Why did they use bullying as a false front to push this agenda through the education system and why are the LEFT running with this agenda? Posted by T800, Sunday, 18 December 2016 8:51:51 AM
| |
diver dan,
"If we are to consider the safety and welfare of the "different" among us..." There's your problem right there, you just opened Pandora's Box. How incredibly disrespectful and cis-normative of you... Don't you know facebook recognises 52 different genders and in a PC world they are all normal, no discrimination allowed. T800 "Why do gay radicals and LW Progressives want to sexualise children before they even enter puberty?" To answer you both, the best I can make sense is that gays don't want to be discriminated against for being different, so they make the argument they ARE normal. So when Sex-Education at schools comes along they have to promote all their gay stuff as being normal too, to everyone. Basically in the interest of non-discrimination they get a free pass to brainwash the kids. And, its like the War on Drugs, a war which will never be won and is very convenient of them for promoting their ideas, because kids will always bully each other. And with liberal idea on 'not allowed to say no' or disipline them or anything else bullying is just as bad if not worse than ever. The liberals had this idea that all kids wear orange for 'No Bullying" You can guess what happened to the kids who wore orange... Posted by Armchair Critic, Sunday, 18 December 2016 9:49:34 AM
| |
When you are trying to teach maths that should be your sole intention. Introducing issues of sexuality or identity into the equation is bad teaching. Kids will be sitting there thinking about what is meant by ‘boyfriend’ and not about the maths problem.
You can achieve your aim by simply saying ‘David and his friend’. Maths classes are not the place to introduce ‘less heteronormative thinking’. There are many more appropriate places to do that if it is required. This is abuse of children over whom you have power. They are in a captive situation. They have come to learn about maths which should be an environment that is emotionally neutral. Introducing less heteronormative thinking should be done with care and concern for the emotional maturity and security of the child. This is probably best done in the security of the family environment. These types of lessons are done mainly with concern for the emotional needs of teachers who are insecure about their less heteronormative status and they try and abuse situations where they have been given a serious responsibility for the sake of bolstering those insecurities. Posted by phanto, Sunday, 18 December 2016 10:27:03 AM
|
Sounds like peedo's and Pizzagate to me.