Maybe some posters should consider if SSM marriage sanctioned - the relevant "fall out" of their advocates proposals recently portrayed in newspapers.

I provide one example -

1. If in an instance of emergency (fire, flooding etc) transgender persons should be treated differently as they would require a separate toilet.

So my question being - what the F!@#!

Most human beings would be appreciative of any assistance in saving lives, by emergency assistance teams and don't look at any person and ask the question - are you gay7

The people I work with (including our gay/lesbian colleagues) are so over these "so called" advocates working on their behalf.

Minotour - come back to me as to your posting that "I lack credibility.

AJ Philips - I await your response.

AJP says:” you claim that an entire demographic of people are perverts, then others have the right to request a justification for that claim. “
I made no such claim. This is just another example of you lying about what I said, then making baseless assertions on what you falsely assert was said by me.
Your assertions are baseless because they refer to words never said by me, which are your own lies.
No wonder you lose the debate, you are incapable of telling the truth.
Bullhead has a different problem.
As an uneducated ignoramus, he seems unconscious of the fact that he is lying, while in your case your fabrications are a definite strategy.

SAINTS,

That’s a transgender issue.

<<If in an instance of emergency (fire, flooding etc) transgender persons should be treated differently as they would require a separate toilet.>>

Transgender people already exist, and will continued to do so with or without same-sex marriage.

<<The people I work with (including our gay/lesbian colleagues) are so over these "so called" advocates working on their behalf.>>

Well, all my gay friends and colleagues are sick of people acting like their gay friends and colleagues represent all gay people.

There, now where even.

<<Minotour - come back to me as to your posting that "I lack credibility.>>

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say to minotaur there, but I would agree with him/her that you lack credibility. I mean, confusing transgender issues with the same-sex marriage debate is a pretty basic mistake.

--

Leo Lane,

You have a short memory, don’t you?

<<I made no such claim. This is just another example of you lying about what I said, then making baseless assertions on what you falsely assert was said by me.>>

“AJP seems to have difficulty with the fact that homosexuals are perverts.” (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=18673#333352)

There you go. An entire demographic. All perverts, according to you.

<<Your assertions are baseless because they refer to words never said by me, which are your own lies.>>

What do you call referring to homosexuals as “perverts” then?

<<No wonder you lose the debate, you are incapable of telling the truth.>>

Apparently it’s not me who's having difficulty telling the truth. Or is it a memory issue? You don't sound to me like you're entirely 'with it'.

I like how you lot are still claiming to have won, though. I don’t think I’ve ever debated a bunch of people so determined to claim victory. It's like you lot are desperate for this to be over. I don’t blame you.

AJ has referred me to the comment upon which he based his assertion.
I withdraw my statement that I made no such claim. I misread his comment, posted in haste, and will repent at leisure.