Yes, Bullhead, your lack of education really shows you up. Research the meanings of “definition” and “axiomatic” so that you can understand how ludicrous your assertions are.
The perverts are agitated about their situation, and want to blame someone.
They can attack traditional society, which to them is the obvious culprit by attacking its institutions. Despite their hatred and contempt for the institution of marriage, they have to pretend that they wish to be part of it to gain a position where they can more effectively attack it.
They will not even name the same sex union, which ceased to be a criminal offence some time ago.
I have a name for it:”perviage”
All we need now is legislation to enact that perviage shall be the union of two people where those people are not a man and a woman

The comedy routine from the anti same-sex marriage brigade continues courtesy of homophobe Leo Lane. And yes, by calling gay people perverts clearly exposes your homophobia. Hey, didn't Paul Hogan have a character called Leo...I do believe so and OLO won't let me print his last name, although a simple google search will reveal all. Taking inspiration from Paul Hogan and channelling his character are you Leo Lane?

Seriously though...do you (and any of your 'supporters') have any sort of coherent argument against same-sex marriage? Marriages that are currently not illegal but simply not given legal recognition under the Marriage Act. There is a difference, although I doubt you have the capacity to see it, let alone comprehend it.

And I'm still waiting (and thankfully not holding my breath) for any sort of substance to the claims the anti same-sex marriage proponents make about 'major changes' to social fabric should legal recognition be given. Then again, maybe I'm just too Bullheaded to see it.

Minotaur:

They might lack substance and intellect but they are not as gutless as you are.

I asked you to put up or shut up but you do not have the strength of character to do either. You are too busy deriding other posters and using your attack on them to also camouflage another attempt to belittle me. You are too gutless to answer my questions without qualification and you are too gutless to shut up since it could be a sure sign of you guilt and your pathetic failure to address your own evasive responses to my initial questions.

I would much rather listen to people who I disagree with but who have the courage of their convictions than an insecure bully like you.

So the views of others are a comedy routine but yours are not? Is this another attempt to bully others? If you can’t beat them at least you can ridicule them. If you were convinced of your own views then you would not need to deride other people or their arguments or even their homophobia.

If you truly were convinced of your views you would have left this discussion long ago since nothing new has been said and so there is no need for you to respond. Another case of put up or shut up for you.

phanto, go back and read my comments and while you're at it take off your blinkers that only allow you to deride and you'll see I did indeed 'put up'. I even addressed your diversionary argument. Maybe it was too complex for you despite being suitably succinct.

No you did not 'put up' - you were just trying to allay your boredom. If you were sincere in putting up then you would not have needed to try and justify your post by telling me you were bored.

Bullhead, you say:” same-sex couples can and do get married. “
By definition, marriage is a union between a man and a woman, so what you assert is nonsense, based on your uneducated ignorance, as is your scurrilous name-calling, asserting that any one who tells the truth about perverts is a homophobe