I agree entirely about the school program. But, 'respecting' girls who pose for pictures? Really?

Kiddy porn is hardly a new phenomena, but existed centuries before safe schools, in different guises?

It's really time we stopped making such an issue over tissue. Time to develop a normal healthy attitude to sex and sexuality.
Of course that will outrage some parents and religious control freaks, with all manner of (dirty minded) unnatural sexual hangups? [And if the cap fits?]

Safe schools just doesn't seualize children or teach them stuff most don't already know? Ignorance is the mother and father of perversion and loveless sex that is forced on the other, via cultural medieval norms, including genital mutilation, child brides, and virtual sexual slavery, (FORCED MARRIAGE) normality in some fully imported alien cultures?

I believe the source of most of this confected outrage comes from folk whose own (unhealthy) attitude to normal healthy sex and sexual development, is fundamentally warped askew, are the ones having all the (dirty minded) problems!?

Teaching kids to respect the rights of others, in all sexual situations; and that love, respect and sex are fundamentally entwined, is hardly welcomed in some (stiff necked) communities?

Role playing just apes what perfectly normal kids do already, but eliminates some of the abysmal (adult) ignorance that usually surrounds this part of normal human relations? And that normality may well include folks with more than 15 partners?

Different folks have different appetites or unmet need? I don't have a patently confected problem with that or different strokes.

This is Australia, not ancient archaic Abyssinia.
Alan B.

yep our secularist society has created an environment of sexualising everything that moves from a very young age and are dumb enough to act surprised when young girls post themselves nude on camera and men perve. Yep they can demand 'respect' however unsafe schools programs that deny kids the right to be kids but instead shove perversion in their face in order to make a few adults feel comfortable results in these outcomes. You are so right Wendy. Its not rocket science.

Are you for real lady where have you been hiding since 1900 I suggest you go back there

The 'new creative image' of sex is anything is permissible and it is perfectly to be thrust upon 'mature age kids' whatever age that is and 'celebrated' - the next agenda after the same sex marriage legislation gets a big tick will likely be dispensing of the legal 'taboo' [how outmoded] of having sex with children under 16 even including those of your own or related family members . . . any traditional family-minder 'frogs' are either not noticing the water is getting hotter and/or just don't have any sense nor leaders of any persuasion to lead them to lobby 'protect my seat in parliament whatever the vocal minority want' politicians!So-called leaders who may have more conservative ideas of sexuality and love [whatever that is now supposed to be defined as] need to get out of the pews and into the real world of the news to make any difference . . . . but I aren't holding my breath!

What complete rot, lies, half truths and religious oppression. I bet this women is upset by public breast feeding as well.
As other have noted it's not the stone age anymore

Me thinks the Christians don't his this because if we educate our kids about sex they'll realize the touching and games they play priest, pastors and church leaders are not so innocent.

but hey what would you expect form a group that thinks women can be bought for 200 foreskins of the enemies