Alan B

"I believe the source of most of this confected outrage comes from folk whose own (unhealthy) attitude to normal healthy sex and sexual development, is fundamentally warped askew, are the ones having all the (dirty minded) problems!?"

So what does that contribute to the debate? If they have no good arguments against the safe schools program then why not just ignore them? Or if you like present an argument against their arguments. It does not matter where their arguments come from any more than it matters where yours come from. The only thing that matters is the strength of the arguments on either side. Policy decisions are made in favour of the best arguments and not the background of the arguer.

You are just displaying your own resentment towards religious people. No one is interested in your resentment only your ideas. You should go and ask a professional to help you with your resentment. That is not the purpose of this forum.

Sexuality is now being portrayed as an battle against adversity.

Everyone has to have a story about how they were able to overcome the oppression and victimisation.

And how they were able to come out, and tell the world they are non-binary, or gay, or LDBT (or is it LBTG or whatever).

In my time, boys wanted to play with balls, and kick them through goal posts, or they were attracted to objects that went round, such as wheels on skateboard and pushbikes.

But now, boys have to be attracted to girls, or attracted to other boys, or boys who think they are girls, or girls who think they are boys, or girls who might be attracted to boys if they were not so attracted to girls who think they are boys.

I sense none of it is healthy.

As for teachers being able to teach students about sex...what a joke.

The teachers can hardly teach the students how to read and write.

I would not rely on teachers to satisfactorily teach students anything at all.

As for social media, it should be banned for anyone under the age of 18, and carry a warning that no social benefits have ever been found for anyone using american spyware.

Hang on, weren't we at one point agreeing that the sexual diversity crowd were a bunch of insufferable prigs and pearl clutching wowsers?

I was going to say that common decency didn't necessarily depend on Christianity or religiosity. However, perhaps it does depend on Christian teaching, because Christianity gets slammed by the atheistic idealogues every time this subject is raised.

Perhaps the Christian-haters are, indeed, perverts and lovers of child porn (which is illegal by the way). One such poster slams the writer for being back in "1900". Sexualisation of children, child pornography and filth is just as obnoxious and perverted as it was in 1900.

As for children being describe as "sexual beings", rubbish. Any of these unnamed 'doctors' (of what?) are perverts themselves. Kinsey, the best known sexual know-all and social manipulator, was a pervert in his private life. He, and probably many of the 'experts" today, try to fashion society around their own deviance. Children are innocent. Just because they unwittingly do things that some pervert regards as an invitation does not alter the fact.

All this sexual rubbish in schools is merely part of the socialist plan. Marxism instructs that before you can take over completly, you have to take over the culture. Their means are education at public schools run by Marxist unions; through the left media, and through entertainment, with the help of left wing actors and writers. See enough of it in movies, read it in books, learn it at school, and it becomes the 'norm'. Take over plan succesful. All that is needed then, is to keep bad-mouthing conservatives and asserting that they are out of date - behind the times. Cynical, evil manipulation in the name of the Marxist utopia.

yeah I remember a few years ago the lefties were all calling taking nude shots of young girls art. Even Turnbull backed the artist. Somehow they believe they are exempt from the adamic nature however their practices prove otherwise.Not content to trash their own morality they want to influence kids instead of allowing them to be kids. They then discover some form of morality when a sick catholic priest molests a child. Oh well to the lefties its all about sides unfortunately as they have no real moral basis to draw from (except from the likes of the very warped Kinsley as has already been pointed out).

Cobber, you really need to get out more. Or do more Googling. The internet is full of articles from medical groups concerned about the early sexualisation of children
In WA a report was tabled in Parliament in 2013 about the early sexualisation of children,,but perhaps religion has snuck into parliamentary reports as well eh?
Even in the past few months there have been media reports of sexualised behaviour in early primary kids, raising a lot of concern from parents and therapists.
Religion has nothing to do with the enjoyment of normal healthy sex, done at an appropriate age.
What we don't need is kids forced into believing random casual sex is the norm or that it will ever provide the pleasure that comes from sex with a person you have a strong emotional attachment to.