@mhaze 9th @LeoLane 10th

Pg 40 Sept4 to LL:

"Let me share a secret...know that my replies are not actually directed at you .... my comments are meant for the 'readers' of this here OLO.... I'm like a Nurseryman who loves planting seeds.... I'm also teaching others how to handle responses like yours."

Fits 'The Hazer' too!

Stupid people never know how stupid they are, even when they are warned of what's coming, be it from me or climate change, they remain stupid.

The Hazer (Hazing is the practice of activities involving harassment, abuse or humiliation used as a way of initiating a person into a group, the IPA?) who is obviously a pompous military-type control freak, loves being 'all powerful' but has lost all that power in his old age - so he comes up with false accusations of "deranged" http://www.dictionary.com/browse/deranged it simply means "insane".

Why do you believe you're in control of this conversation Hazer? You say "deranged" in reply to me stating that you belong in an 'insane asylum'? It's planting seeds, you don't even realise it!

Is it deranged to call someone a big mouth and a liar with zero evidence?

Is it deranged to call someone an "imposter" (GY said that) with zero evidence?

Is it deranged to imagine you know others motivations, state of knowledge, or what someone else is thinking?

Is it deranged to be so paranoid you see conspiracies despite the absence of evidence?

Is it deranged to accuse the BOM, IPCC, NASA of fraud by intentionally faking scientific validated data?

Is it deranged to say "I don't believe that NASA and the IPCC ARE FAKING THE DATA: I provide compelling evidence to show this."

BUT then not provide ANY EVIDENCE to back it up bar innuendo?

Is it deranged to believe you know what the Climate Science is without reading or understanding any of it?

Is it deranged to claim that you know more about AGW/CC science than 30,000 plus qualified scientists who actually did the work and follow the same scientific method that took man to the moon?
-

@mhaze 9th @LeoLane 10th con't

Well I do think it is deranged.

I think it is self-evidently INSANE to think like that and proves to me you two are no better than a flaming insane jihadi terrorist blowing themselves up.

Is it deranged to call an idiot and idiot when the evidence is right there on the screen for all to see?

Is it deranged to label a fur king more ron as such when they are a fur king more ron? Incompetent and ignorant of the subject matter they claim to know?

No I don't think it is.

It's logically rational to respond in this way. You've been done like a dinner.

From me people can see a wealth of high quality information in "entirely relevant links" about the science, psychology/thinking, and logic to compare against a number of fools "puffing up their obviously low self-esteem!"

Unintelligent trolls who infest internet forums like this, who are supported and encouraged by incompetent biased moderators and extremist ideology "are used to or hope to get away with this!"

Then I turn up and strip the facade away and call a fool a fool and I back it up with self-evident truths in front of everyone's eyes!

The Hazer then stupidly admits:
"Its been my aim from the moment I read his first silly post to facilitate his derangement and ultimate exit. I think we're nearly there."

There is a mirror in your bathroom. Go peer into your own image!

You have exposed yourself openly as an untrustworthy dishonest manipulative disingenuous TROLL!

You're only course of action now is to deny it or leave! The very thing you claim I will have to do. But everyone else now knows with CERTAINTY that you just another FAKE like Marohasy is.

You're both irrelevant Bigmouths!

There's an old Aussie saying that goes: "Would not piss on you if you were on fire!"

Ponder that thought.

The flea says that bigmouth has “thrown a mirror on commentary by Leo Lane and mhaze; .”
So when I point out a lie asserted by bigmouth, and he points out a fact that I have contributed, and he calls it a lie, that is a mirror, is it , flea?
It is stupid retaliation which shows bigmouth’s outhouse rat cunning as well as his puny intellect.
JaneP is incapable of coherent thought, but she seems to think it is permissible for an attorney general to break the law if he is pursuing a target approved by the criminal greens. I am sure you did your bit in the gulf disaster JaneP, dipping wildlife in oil and photographing it, and applying chemicals to the oil so that it would not disappear naturally without trace, as it does if left to the normal natural process.
Surely you must have noticed bigmouth's mental state before mhaze ever commented on him.

Leo

You did not understand what I meant.
Many times I have commented on your aggressive meanlingless commentary. Thomas stated much the same thing in a more colourful way ; you made aggressive comments against Thomas, you coped it back.

The difference between your commentary and Thomas's is that he provided many links to science; you generally make aggressive and vacuous comments.

The Oceans have a large influence on climate; here is a read for you Leo; real science:

https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2016-046_0.pdf

ant,

What is the measurement of control oceans have on climate?

And what measurement or degree of influence does ocean algae have on ocean control of weather and climate ?

JF Aus

The reference I provided is very comprehensive; pretty well hot off the press:

http://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2016-046_0.pdf