Once again, Binoy Kampfmark displays his unfitness to be called "an Australian" by his constant advocacy of the rights of foreigners over the rights of Australians.

"Refugees" are not trying to enter African countries, Asian countries, Muslim countries, or South American countries. Quite the reverse. Africans, Asians, Muslims, and South Americans all want to live in white countries. I think that says a lot for the white race and our ability to create functioning and desirable societies. But the more Africans, Asians, Muslims, and south Americans who come to white societies, them more white societies will become more like dysfunctional African, Asian, Muslim, and South American countries.

The ghettoization of white societies into crime and welfare dependent ethnic enclaves seems to validate that.

It was said of socialism that it's purpose was not to make everybody equally rich, but to make everybody equally poor. The same can be said of Multiculturalism. we can't have white societies being held up as the only decent countries to live in, so let's trash their societies with ever more waves of dysfunctional people who will make every society on earth equally dysfunctional.

If anyone was thinking till now that the Australian government cared about anyone's dignity and welfare or kept to any morals - think again!

Today you are lucky - but it will not last forever. Tomorrow you too could find yourself crunched in the system and even if it doesn't happen to you in this lifetime - it could just as well be your fate in the next: you are not immune from being born in Nauru, or whatever other dreadful place will be used by the Australian or other governments at the time. If you support the Australian government - your guilty conscience will take you there.

Look, the only reason that the Nazi death camps were even possible was the inherent secrecy and BS propaganda that presented them as virtual holiday camps run by inherently humane Officials!

The only reason we know what really happened was the almost flawless Nazi records and some of the documentaries General Eisenhower insisted on, given without them, nobody would believe what went on!

And underlines the need for transparency and the fearless reporting it would make possible? If that doesn't suit a few inherently nasty Nauruans or point scoring blame shifting, more pious than the pope, politicians? Tough!

As history proves beyond question, the only time perpetually prevaricating politicians need secrecy, is when there's something to hide?

That said in no way should we can ever resettle any of these irregular arrivals in Australia or New Zealand, given the latter would only ever serve as a conduit that would allow the people smugglers to present a new business model? And restart the boats, along with the transition camps that are also part of a larger regional problem!

WE WILL DECIDE WHO COMES HERE AND THE MANNER OF THEIR ARRIVAL!
Alan B.

The quoted asylum seeker doesn't have to kill himself to get to Australia (he would be buried in Nauru if he did kill himself) and he does NOT have to get to Australia at all. He has not been invited here, and he is not wanted here. He new full well that he would never be settled in Australia, that he was an illegal arrival. He knew that he was sent to Nauru, because off-shore detention is the rule for illegal boat arrivals. The fellow must be as thick as a brick.

Nauru contracted to take these illegal boat people (for a very considerable sum) until they were found to be refugees (or not); to resettle them in Nauru, or house them until another country agreed to take them. Nauru reneged on the contract but, stiff cheese, it is still their problem.

Illegals sick of waiting (bless them) have elected to return to their countries of origin - which shows how much 'danger' they really faced in their home countries! The rest can do the same or stay in Nauru. Australia should wash its hands of the whole farce, and never again try to do business with backward countries.

I strongly agree with Lego's description of the writer of this pap, who is a malcontent trouble maker, best suited to some other place of abode,

and as for the thousands in camps wanting to come here legally? Oh thats right in some them the Muslims won't even allow others in the camps.

Simply fact letting them come to Australia would be opening the flood gates to more and more and more coming here.

Dudd and Dillard did that and over 50,000 plus we are still paying for.

Merkel did that to Germany and look at the mess they are in.

Anyone advocating bringing in more refugees not genuine ones but the welfare for lifers and non integrators should be forced to accommodate some in their homes and feed and support them, that will change their minds.

Quote from one "If I am made to have my baby on Nauru, I will have a baby in my tent and kill myself and my baby." That is an attempt to manipulate public opinion in her favor, $10 says she did not carry out that threat.

They are well versed by the advocates and do gooders how to manipulate the gullible media who are desperate for a sensational story.
Just go through your newspapers etc and see what dribble they are coming out with nowadays, borders on a waste of time reading.

Follow the link to see 1 month of sexually orientated crimes by migrants in Sweden alone, this is what opening the floodgates could bring.

Approx quarter way down the page see Appendix.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8663/germany-migrants-rape