The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Australia could take many more refugee families > Comments

Australia could take many more refugee families : Comments

By Peter Bowden, published 5/8/2016

Australia, of all nations, could be the first to show the world that people of many creeds and beliefs can live together in peace.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. Page 11
  10. 12
  11. All
Good luck, JayB, we'll be barracking for you :)

Hi Philip,

If men from a particular culture are taught from birth that women are inferior AND that uncovered women (as they see them) are clearly asking for it, and try to have their way with them, then clearly there is a huge problem - from a human rights point of view generally, and a feminist point of view especially - with their presence in a country in which women have formal equal rights and don't - or shouldn't - have to go anywhere without male protection and heavily covered.

How to screen those men out of any refugee or migrant intake may present some problems. But any breach of the law which recognises women as equals to men, laws which outlaw oppressive cultural practices, should be met by immediate deportation.

I'm confident that most women would agree with me, except those who have to check their 'Victim Meter' first.

Cheers,

Joe
Posted by Loudmouth, Wednesday, 10 August 2016 10:36:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Unbelievable!! Sixty one comments on a paper that says Australia could take many more refugees than it does. Not one is supportive. Comments such as 'subversive thinking', 'total lack of logic', 'nonsense', 'just mad' fill their posts.

A reader gets the impression that the comments are written by middle aged white men, Abbott voters, lacking the courage to put their actual names on their statements.To Diver Dan, Cato, Cobber the Hound , Hasbeen , Banjo and all the others, I say 'Shame' Think again!" , Australia is a better place, a more helpful place, and a more compassionate country than you make it sound. It is also more courageous than you portray. We did sign these international conventions. Are we then also a country that is more than willing to throw out the window the international conventions that it committed to ? It seems like Hasbeen, Banjo , etc are ready to do so.

Peter Bowden
Posted by PeterBo, Thursday, 11 August 2016 10:27:55 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
PeterBo,
Times change and with them that which was appropriate becomes
inappropriate.
That is why laws are not set in concrete and are amended or repealed.
Are you really suggesting that we should follow France and keep letting
more moslems enter the country until we have the same percentage as France ?

Even the government there is preparing for civil war.
Posted by Bazz, Thursday, 11 August 2016 10:52:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Peter,

You slander some of us: I'm quite happy with increasing the refugee intake by 50%, provided that any policy favours the most persecuted, and those who are prepared to abide by the laws and conventions of Australia. This should not include men who believe, and are likely to act on their beliefs, that women are inferior and should be kept inside or take their chances.

Did those outrages in Koln happen as reported last New Year's Eve, hundreds of women assaulted ? If so, then any refugee policy should be extremely stringent and discriminatory against likely perpetrators of similar sexual violence. You and I and all of us know who that might involve.

Joe Lane
Posted by Loudmouth, Thursday, 11 August 2016 11:45:28 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
PeterBo:

You sound like a typical bleeding heart apologist, pushing the barrow for the U.N./E.C. globalist agents.

The U.N. Conventions that were signed were put in place by Politicians, some with their own particular vested interests in mind.

What decision a Politician makes is NOT necessarily in the long-term interests of the country in general, but rather to enhance the Party Policies, or confer certain personal internal reward, considered advantageous at the particular time of signing.

Unfortunately we have seen many Politicians pass through "Millionaire`s Row", who have never considered what is the best for the future of the country, but what is best for him/her to claw their way further up the power ladder!

Every piece of Legislation that may have a long-term effect upon the Financial/Political future of the country in general, should be put to the people in the form of Referendum, allowing True Democracy to be enacted and genuinely truly indicative of the will of the people!

At this time in history, if certain Politicians and Asylum Seeker Advocates had their own way, we the White Caucasians (and the Aborigines), would be all deported to global parts unknown, to satisfy the hidden agenda of these very dangerous clowns!

"Some may call it Conspiracy!"
Posted by Crackcup, Friday, 12 August 2016 6:35:49 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Peter,

I'm sure that immigration officials do their job competently, but could I suggest that a few more questions are put on the form for all prospective migrants and refugees:

* Do you believe that men and women have equal rights before the law ?

* Do you believe that the law should be applied equally to all, regardless of gender, class and position ?

* Do you believe that everybody has the right to believe, not to believe, or to change their beliefs as they see fit ?

* Do you believe that apostates should be punished and, if so, how ?

* Do you believe that homosexuals should be punished and, if so, how ?

If an applicant answers "No" to Questions 1-3, or "Yes" to Questions 4 and 5, no problems, their application should be shuffled to the bottom of the pile, and they can be politely requested to piss off.

Just trying to help :)

Joe
Posted by Loudmouth, Friday, 12 August 2016 10:10:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. Page 11
  10. 12
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy