The Forum > Article Comments > ‘But aren’t 97 per cent of climate scientists sure that humans are causing global warming?’ > Comments
‘But aren’t 97 per cent of climate scientists sure that humans are causing global warming?’ : Comments
By Don Aitkin, published 22/4/2016'Why one hundred? If I were wrong, then one would be enough!’
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
-
- All
Posted by JF Aus, Friday, 6 May 2016 9:52:13 AM
| |
Posted by ant, Friday, 6 May 2016 9:57:28 AM
| |
The evidence provided by Professors Lindzen and Spencer was tested in a Court setting in relation to climate science:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/may/11/coal-made-its-best-case-against-climate-change-and-lost?CMP=share_btn_fb Posted by ant, Thursday, 12 May 2016 9:57:37 AM
| |
How many climate scientists are there in total in the world?
Is it 97 percent of all climate scientists in the world or is it 97 percent of just 500 or so? How long has climate science been a science? Posted by JF Aus, Thursday, 12 May 2016 9:19:47 PM
|
I am about to go and buy a flea collar to wear while reading OLO. Perhaps a can of Mortein would be better. TIC
Can you possibly understand warmth coming off the surface of the sea can be already warm as it passes over land where the warmth can increase due to above water albeit land temperature.
It is increase in warmth that can lead to increase in fires and increase in severity.
It's warmth associated with algae that is linked to surface water temperature and warmth (or cold) coming off the water.
How can CO2 warm surface water or land in one area and not the whole globe at the same time?