The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > ‘But aren’t 97 per cent of climate scientists sure that humans are causing global warming?’ > Comments

‘But aren’t 97 per cent of climate scientists sure that humans are causing global warming?’ : Comments

By Don Aitkin, published 22/4/2016

'Why one hundred? If I were wrong, then one would be enough!’

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All
The flea says “Whether man created or otherwise,”
You know that it is not man created, flea, as you have no science to show any measurable human effect on climate, so why continue with your dishonest nonsense?
Posted by Leo Lane, Saturday, 23 April 2016 7:45:39 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The flea gives a misleading description of the state of the Great Barrier Reef, which over the years has often bleached and recovered.
The clown on the you tube referenced by the flea talked about the “destruction” of the reef, which is nonsense, and did a promotion of the climate fraud, asserting that human emissions should be curtailed. Of course the flea would only reference a liar, because who else would support his baseless fraud promotion?
Fortunately there was some honest reporting:
“A senior scientist says coral on the Great Barrier Reef is more resilient than many people think.
The current coral bleaching event on the Great Barrier Reef has attracted major media coverage and attention from senior political leaders.
But Dr David Wachenfeld, the Director for Reef Recovery at the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority says coral’s ability to recover from bleaching is being left out of the discussion.

While images of fields of bone-white coral may paint a grim picture to viewers, Dr Wachenfeld says coral can withstand significant amounts of stress.
“Its also important to remember that ‘bleached’ does not always mean ‘dead’,” he says.
“if the level of stress the coral is under improves, the coral can re-accept zooxanthellae from the water column or promote the reproduction of zooxanthellae that remain in the polyps.”
https://northernbeachesnews.net/2016/03/27/bleaching-not-a-death-sentence-for-great-barrier-reef/
"Destruction of the Reef" has been done to death flea, so everyone is aware that it is nonsense, and dishonest.
Posted by Leo Lane, Saturday, 23 April 2016 10:34:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Leo Lane: “Fortunately there was some honest reporting:
“A senior scientist says coral on the Great Barrier Reef is more resilient than many people think. The current coral bleaching event on the Great Barrier Reef has attracted major media coverage and attention from senior political leaders.
But Dr David Wachenfeld, the Director for Reef Recovery at the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority says coral’s ability to recover from bleaching is being left out of the discussion.”

It is indeed rare to get honest reporting about our Great Barrier Reef that has allegedly been condemned to death by human-caused global warming. As recently as yesterday morning, ABC News Radio served up a reef death-sentence diatribe by Greens Senator Larissa Waters
Posted by Raycom, Sunday, 24 April 2016 12:27:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Anybody seen that sod, AJ Phillips around here, someplace?

Damn, looks like I have seen another trendy lefty off. AJ, where aaaaaarrrrrrre yoooouuuu? Cmon boy. You can't keep ducking this global warming debate any longer. I've got you by the short and curlies and hiding won't save you.

This whole climate change crap is blowing up on your face and it is just another example of how you trendy lefties get everything wrong. Time to jump ship and get with the intelligent people.
Posted by LEGO, Sunday, 24 April 2016 4:11:34 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Take your seat next to the creationist Don.
Posted by cornonacob, Sunday, 24 April 2016 7:36:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The flea says:” The argument about whether 97% of climate scientists believe the consensus view is rather academic. It is fair to say that the vast majority do.”
This is an assertion that the majority of climate scientists are ignorant, or liars
If they do not know that there is no science to show any measurable human effect on climate, they are ignorant. If they do know, but support the assertion that global warming is human caused, they are liars.
You could not disagree, could you, flea?
Posted by Leo Lane, Sunday, 24 April 2016 8:15:07 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy