The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Brussels attacks: restrain and rethink > Comments

Brussels attacks: restrain and rethink : Comments

By Mal Fletcher, published 23/3/2016

Today's events in Brussels also remind us of the failure of political correctness as either a way of thinking or a government policy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. ...
  14. 18
  15. 19
  16. 20
  17. All
Another foiled bombing attempt in Brussels.
When will they ever learn ?
Posted by Bazz, Saturday, 26 March 2016 4:05:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Bazz and Jay

Have you ever had the opportunity to think critically? to analyse, evaluate, and improve on your own thinking?

Firstly, you assert from the existence of Janissary corps and terrorist claiming to act in the name of Islam, that these acts do comply with Islamic teachings. But neither of you have presented proof despite being requested to do so.

Bazz, you're assertion is contradicted by an eminent scholar:

“At NO TIME did the classical jurists offer any approval or legitimacy to what we nowadays call terrorism. Nor indeed is there any evidence of the use of terrorism as it is practiced nowadays.” Source: Bernard Lewis “Islam: the religion and the people” p. 151

You have not provided any evidence to the contrary. A person committed to critical thinking and the truth would provide evidence to support their views or admit to a mistake, and be glad to do so because it points to a solution: communicating the true teachings of Islam to avoid further harm being inflict on innocents.

Clearly, if you are not prepared to engage is a fair and honest dialogue then you are nothing more than " a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance." Merriam-Webster definition of a bigot

You are a person who is "obstinately devoted to prejudices even when these views are challenged or proven to be false." http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Bigotry

And Jay, where is the support for your assertion that the Janissary corps comply with Islamic teaching?

Would you like to share your sources? My guess is that you (like Kactus) will not share your sources for two reasons. Firstly, you know they will not bear up to serious scrutiny. Secondly, they will link you to hate-mongers and bigots.

Bazz and Jay, your behaviour has been cowardly and as fellow Australians embarrassing and such a poor example for the next generation (not that you guys seem to care).
Posted by grateful, Saturday, 26 March 2016 4:34:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"...concede to undisputed authority." Is that the sum total of your argument, grateful, appeal to authority?

How does your authority account for Islamification of North Africa, for example? Was it missionary zeal, or was it the fact, as history records, of murderous military conquest?

Did those that opposed being Islamified, simply by their opposition, allow the Muslim armies to justify war on the basis of self-defense, as is terrorism?

Do you think taxation, devshirme and second-class citizenship were accepted by the subjugated because they saw some great benefit to themselves, other than staying alive?

Your "undisputed" authority must wear rose-coloured glasses if, like you, he believes Islam was peacefully propogated. I recommend the article I linked for you earlier (translated from Russian, I believe, so nothing to do with the West) as a vision aid.
Posted by Luciferase, Saturday, 26 March 2016 5:10:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Lol!

Luciferace,

You've got a nerve. Complete contempt for scholarship and the facts.

And still no sources! More claims, but what are your sources?

Are you also of those "obstinately devoted to prejudices even when these views are challenged or proven to be false." http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Bigotry

Shameless and cowardly behaviour. Is this the future of Australia?
Posted by grateful, Saturday, 26 March 2016 5:33:48 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I see our posts crossed, grateful.

It is too cute to separate the historic and present day violent activities of those acting in the name of Islam, entirely from its teachings.

It is not difficult to conjure a self-defense basis for violence if one doesn't exist. History is full of it.

Islam is what Islam does.
Posted by Luciferase, Saturday, 26 March 2016 6:19:27 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
BTW earlier I said Chamberlain chased the Moslems out of France.
I should of course said it was Charlemagne.
We will need our own Charlemagne. I wonder if Tony Abbott would stand in ?

Grateful, you are a self important windbag !
Waffle waffle, the Islamists call people like you "Useful Idiots".

Don't you see that it has gone way past academic tete a tetes ?
The Islamists do not even know you are there ?
You can just sit there and fiddle with your references.

It is now all down to the police, military and intelligence people.
You and I are irrelevant, we now do not count in this "game".
The Islamists forced it on us once they brought the Baghdad warfare
model to the west.

We now await the Polish Army.
Posted by Bazz, Saturday, 26 March 2016 11:11:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. ...
  14. 18
  15. 19
  16. 20
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy