ant,

You post some interesting links there, excellent evidence maybe.

Do you think that when algae takes up CO2 the warmth in that CO2 is also taken up in the algae, albeit remaining there for a few minutes or hours?

I mean warmth in algae apart from warmth absorbed directly from sunlight during photosynthesis.

The flea asserts that I should not comment on science because my qualification is in law, and not science
He inconsistently considers comments from an unqualified ignoramus like himself are acceptable.
He also refers us to the deceptively named Skeptical Science, run by an ex-cartoonist, John Cook, which posts nothing but rubbish.
To confirm the unscientific nonsense to which he supplies links, he gives an extract:” "An earthquake measuring 6.0 on the Richter Scale shakes the earth with the destructive energy of 6.3x1013 Joules. Since 1998, our climate has absorbed more than 2 billion such earthquakes (4.0 every second) in accumulated energy from the sun, due to greenhouse gases, and continues to absorb more energy as heat each and every day."
Only an unqualified ignoramus like the flea, could mistake that for science.
The flea’s support for the baseless assertion of human caused climate change, has no basis in science.
He has been requested dozens of times to refer us to any science which sows a human caused, measurable effect on climate. In his uncivil way, he ignores the question. What else can an unqualified, fraud supporting ignoramus do. His friend, Max Puce, became tired of being shown up as a liar, and fraud supporter, and went away.The flea never tires of it.

Leo Lane,

No need to worry about ant.
ant is grasping at straws.
At present he is likely very busy trying to find excuses to dodge answering reality of whether there is warmth in ocean algae or not.

Leo

Just more abuse and semantics again.

The reference to the number of metaphoric earthquakes refers to what happens between IR and CO2.

The reference below discusses the forcing between IR and CO2.

http://www.windows2universe.org/earth/climate/greenhouse_effect_gases.html

The forcing is described in Watts per square meter, for CO2 the table near the end of the article shows 1.532W/square meter (2.33W/square meter when other greenhouse gases are included. There are billions of square meters involved.

Another way of explaining the forcing is:

https://vimeo.com/128141163

The vacuous response of the flea, when asked for a scientific justification for his support of the baseless assertion of a measurable human effect on climate:
“The reference to the number of metaphoric earthquakes refers to what happens between IR and CO2.”
His insolent incivility means that he will never give a relevant response, such as an acknowledgement that there is no science to support the assertion of a measurable human effect on climate.
Instead, he endlessly posts material which bears no relation to his assertion..

All this talk about Algae spikes is forgetting a few important things.
A few turds in the ocean will have little fertilisation effect compared to a widespread flood event. Humans turd about the same amount each day so there will not be any spikes but what comes from space is a different story.
"The invisible rain of comet dust, if it occurs, would be very slow. It can take months or even years for fine dust to settle out of the high atmosphere."
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/19apr_isonids/
Then there are volcanoes both under and above the sea. Changes in the tides from planetary movements will cause different erosion and mixing of nutrients.