The Forum > Article Comments > Australia's day for secrets, flags and cowards > Comments
Australia's day for secrets, flags and cowards : Comments
By John Pilger, published 25/1/2016Among settler nations with indigenous populations, apart from a facile 'apology' in 2008, only Australia has refused to come to terms with the shame of its colonial past.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
I think that traditionally, young children were not exactly highly valued - they could always be reproduced. So in some families, according to the death records, they may have had ten or twelve kids but almost all died in infancy. Perhaps this is why surnames that were around in the nineteenth century haven't survived - because their children didn't survive.
Of course, introduced diseases wiped out many people, Black and White, in those days. There was no cure for TB, 'consumption', 'phthysis', until after the War. Women became sterile from STDs. And no, no poisoned blankets etc. and all that paranoid bullsh!t.
Meanwhile, the workers were getting on with business, raising all of their kids to adulthood. My wife's great-grandparents, hard-working people, had twelve kids and they all survived to adulthood. Hence, in SA, for some ancestors, huge books of genealogies and huge numbers of descendants; for others nothing.
But I don't think that populations actually declined as much as we assume now. In 1860, at the Select Committee investigation into Aboriginal affairs, Rev. Taplin was asked (and you can imagine the committee members nodding in anticipation) if numbers were declining rapidly. No, he said, we've had more births than deaths. And that seemed to be the case on missions - and from natural growth and voluntary movement, not - ever - from any forced settlement. Not in SA, anyway.
Best wishes in Iowa,
Joe