Mhaze,
it's all a conspiracy! Of the guv-ern-ment. And the moon landing was faked... I learned this on that thar internet thang.
Regards,
Max

Mhaze
Always use latest data.
Last graph in
http://members.pcug.org.au/~terryg/Snowdepth.pdf

Leo

The IPA is an extreme ring wing political group, you provide a political reference basically.
Exactly why is there comment in relation to Senator Wong? Any article that mixes politics and science loses any credibility. Companies that are involved with mining are members of the IPA.

There are thousands of peer reviewed papers published every year; yet, we are to believe that one author knows better than pretty well every other practitioner. Books do not have the same status as papers published in Science Journals where peer review has taken place.

The Carter book was published in 2010; we did not know about just how savagely Greenland glaciers were falling apart at that stage. The pool of cold melt water in the Atlantic created from the thawing of Greenland glaciers was not an issue discussed at that time. It is having an impact on weather and ocean currents.

There have been a number of research papers written since Carter’s book in relation to the scientific consensus they all pretty well agree with each other.
To suggest that Carter has a better handle on climate science; than say NASA, stretches credulity to the limit. But, there are almost 200 major National Agencies that agree with man created climate change.
ExxonMobil scientists in the 1970s and 1980s also held a view that anthropogenic climate change is real.

We are to believe that Russian, British, Australian, Chinese, Danish, Dutch, Swedish et al climate scientists are all involved in a conspiracy...get real.

mhaze, since when does 6 (six) suddenly become 6,000 ( six thousand)?

Here is an interesting weather pattern developing:

http://robertscribbler.com/2015/12/27/warm-arctic-storm-to-hurl-hurricane-force-winds-at-uk-and-iceland-push-temps-to-72-degrees-f-above-normal-at-north-pole

Max Puce, we do not need babbling idiotic posts from you to confirm that you have no science or rational assertion to justify your untenable position.
You have already satisfied us that you are clueless.
The science, which I posted above, confirms that the human effect on climate is trivial, and not measurable. Like the flea, you have no science to support your baseless assertions.

The demonstrable, repeatable physics of CO2's Radiative Forcing Equation show the difference between the pre Industrial CO2 levels and today's CO2 levels to be an extra 4 Hiroshima bombs per second heat retained.

Trivial? I think not.

Scientific? Every National Academy of Science on the planet says so. Every decent physics lab as well.

Which leaves us with there simply not being enough tinfoil in the world big enough to build the tin-foil hat you need to protect you from a 200 year old super-conspiracy run by THEM!... whoever they are. After all, this conspiracy includes every National Academy of Science on the planet, and stretches from just after the Napoleonic Wars, through WW1 and WW2, the Cold War, pre-9/11 to post-9/11 and onwards. Now *that's* a conspiracy!

Max

Leo, uses fallacious arguments such as constant ad hominem attacks . They are used often instead of addressing content.

In relation to Professor Carter he uses the fallacious argument of appealing to authority.
Giving undue importance to one person’s opinion. against literally multitudes of other climate scientists.

He uses the fallacious technique of repeating constantly the same assertions which are patently untrue.

Science clearly does not get dented by these techniques Leo uses constantly.

A further sign of warm temperature.

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/dec/20/global-warming-weather-environment-el-nino?CMP=share_btn_fb