The flea is well aware that there is no proven connection between global warming and extreme weather, but because he has no science to support his position, he dishonestly asserts the unsustainable, emphasising his lack of any scientific credibility. In any event he has no science to show any measurable human effect on climate, so his assertions are baseless:
“The energy mankind generates is so small compared to that overall energy budget that it simply cannot affect the climate…The planet’s climate is doing its own thing, but we cannot pinpoint significant trends in changes to it because it dates back millions of years while the study of it began only recently. We are children of the Sun; we simply lack data to draw the proper conclusions.” — Russian Scientist Dr. Anatoly Levitin, the head of geomagnetic variations laboratory at the Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Read more: http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/05/14/co2-nears-400-ppm-relax-its-not-global-warming-end-times-but-only-a-big-yawn-climate-depot-special-report/#ixzz3xIGg65GI

Even the deceptively named fraud supporters, Skeptical Science say:
” the reason more hurricanes are being observed may be due to an improved ability to observe them, thanks to aircraft, radar and satellites.”

Yes, Max, that is as close as you will go to an admission of your unsupportable, fraudulent, position:” yeah, I guess you got me. Global Warming science is so unfounded, so lacking in evidence that every National Academy of science on the entire planet accepts the 'lacking' evidence!”
That is certainly a strong argument for a Royal Commission into this travesty. The scientific bodies who supported it were pulled into line by their memberships. The Royal Society and others were forced to retract their dishonest support for “human caused” warming, but the Academies need a Royal Commission.
As for “feeding the troll”, Max, you are the troll.

Max

Leo has tied himself up in knots in responding to you

Funny how Leo hasn't answered any of the science questions I have asked.

I made this comment, after asking Leo science questions on 11th January :

"An abusive comment back, and saying they are silly questions would highlight you have nothing valid to present. Just responding to one of the questions is no answer, as you make blanket statements about climate science being wrong."

An addition, saying they have nothing to do with science is another fail.

He has not responded.

Leo

There are any amount of sites which say that extreme weather is associated with climate change. You don't get proper information from non scientist blog sites such as climate deport.

Leo, here is a quote from your reference:

"Climate Myth: Hurricanes aren't linked to global warming"

Debunk the scientist explaining hurricanes in film clip, Leo. He talks about the relationship between hurricanes and warm Oceans. He gives a more contemporary view on hurricanes, than some of the references provided in the article. The quote you gave from Skeptical Science represents pure cherry picking, the reference below contains your quote:

https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=64

The current Sub Tropical Storm Alex should not be happening in Winter in the Atlantic; quite extraordinary.

Hi Ant,
climate deniers are a dime a dozen: all insane attention seeking time-wasting fools on a quest to save the free market from... some conspiracy in their imaginations? What do they fear? France went nuclear decades ago, and have some of the cheapest most reliable electricity in the world, and export more than any other country. Then with abundant reliable electricity, we can charge all the electric cars we want overnight and during the day, or even recycle burned boron pellets. Shutting down fossil fuels will also prepare us for their inevitable peak and decline, save 2.6 million lives a year, and clean up Asia's polluted cities. What on EARTH is Leo so frightened of? Nothing sane. It's all in his head, and probably a dysfunctional personality. I don't like the way I've let him under my skin, so I'll leave this conversation up to you. If you can be bothered! I'll understand if you tire of this predictable little troll as well.

Hi Max

I think Leo sets himself up as a straw man, he has not offered anything in the way of science. He supports the IPA and Heartlands from what I can gather.
I keep responding as the number who read various articles and posts exceeds the number who actually post.

The two science deficient dunces team up to talk nonsense The flea complains again that I do not answer his stupid questions, and Max, his co-fraud supporter uses the scurrilous and baseless term “denier”.
What science are they supposed to be denying, Max?
The flea thinks his stupid questions should be answered.
How about answering a sensible question, flea?
To what science are you able to refer us to show any measurable effect of human emissions on climate?
If there were any such science, you and Max would not be the dishonest fraud supporters you are.
Good to see the back of you, Max. One less troll.