ttbn, absolutely, 100% correct, the settled science clearly shows that ALL children raised in non traditional families are damaged by it. A few decades from now our PM will be apologising to children damaged by same sex adoption.

Suseonline, i don't hate GLBT people, have many gay friends, who also do NOT want either gay marriage or adoption of children. Where does your heterophobia, misandry, sexism & christophobia come from? Did you have any male children? if so i pity them.

onthebeach, absolutely, 100% correct, lesbians & femi-NAZIS make terrible mothers of children. their hatred of children is why they pushed young women into careers instead of families.

plantagenet, absolutely, 100% correct, people who mentor a life of promiscuity to their children will manufacture dysfunctional children.

Suseonline, so you filled the heads your young goats with good old fashioned communist guilt & self hatred?

plantagenet, i bet she likes that idea.

ttbn, absolutely, 100% correct, again.

plantagenet, "Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." is fine until you bring a child into your life, then the welfare of the child trumps your right to neglect or abuse the child whether biological or adopted.

AJ Philips, already been scientifically proven as you well know.

wearestardust, but the settled science is already here to prove that children raised in non traditional families are damaged by it.

http://www.henrymakow.com/2_moms.html

Rhian, i thought women were supposed to be smarter than men? are you suggesting that you don't understand the article when the male commenters do?

onthebeach, sounds about right, you get better stats on female infanticide in WA too.

Yuyutsu, children have the right to be raised by both biological parents or the biological father if the mother is a dead beat. That almost always gives the best results.

runner, absolutely, 100% correct, but it is extremely likely that body parts are being used here, people without a positive religion have lower morals, ethics & principles, the antisocialists are capable of anything. Or "whatever it takes".

NathanJ, absolutely, 100% correct,

onthebeach, absolutely, 100% correct, again.

ttbn, absolutely, 100% correct, again, but call it what it is bigotry, heterophobia, sexism, misandry, conservophobia, christophobia by GLBT chauvinist pigs.

AJ Philips, http://www.henrymakow.com/2_moms.html

AJ,

I feel no obligation to to "justify (my) original remark" to you, someone who has already made up his mind about what I am. As I said, you are welcome to think of me as a 'homophobe' in defence of your own opinions. I fully appreciate that your tactics are part of your Leftist brainwashing, and I accept that your thinking will not change. I also accept your 'no bullying here' comment because that is also part of your conditioning. You are not, yet, on my 'idiot' list, and I am prepared to respond to you, remembering the 3 posts rule.

imacentristmoderate,

Thank you for your support and refusal to be cowed by the Leftist bullies. All Leftists are bullies; it's the way they operate.

Pete,
So, I made a mistake thinking that you might have a sense of humour: so, let's keep it serious, and be ourselves as per the entertaining and clever old poof, Oscar Wilde.

And indeed you have no obligation to, ttbn.

<<I feel no obligation to to "justify (my) original remark" to you…>>

The problem is not what you won’t justify, but what you can’t. Why, you could send me packing right now, toddling off with my tail between my legs, by simply justifying your claim. Instead, you choose the ad hominem route with assumptions about why I say what I have said.

Iamsuchacharacatureofaconservativethatiampossiblyjusthavingeveryoneon,

I’m sorry, but the science on this matter is not settled. I’ve covered this many times before on OLO. In fact, the science is heavily weighted towards the conclusion that children of same-sex couples fare just as well, if not better, than children of opposite-sex couples.

Here’s some scholarly works on the matter:

http://dime159.dizinc.com/~uv1258/blog/Matrimonio/archivos/wainright_2004.pdf
http://people.virginia.edu/~cjp/articles/wp06.pdf
http://66.7.216.77/~uv1258/blog/Matrimonio/archivos/wainright_2008.pdf
http://www.ionainstitute.eu/pdfs/1-s2.0-S0049089X12000610-main.pdf
http://squareonemd.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Same-Sex-Parenting-Meta-Analysis-Crowl-Ahn-Baker-2008.pdf

If you get through that, let me know and I’ll point you to some more. They’re a lot more reliable than the sample size of one that you provided us with in your link to the quack who blames the illuminati and offers no evidence for his claims.

ttbn, no worries mate, i was a Democrat, snag when younger & sillier. So took it rather personally when the femi-NAZI leftists blamed me for everything wrong in the world & will never back down when it comes to protecting children from corporate pedophilia.

AJ Philips, the link i provided is from a PHD Humanities academic as in Dr of.

Q, are you suggesting that humanities academics are UN-reliable?

i believe almost all academics lie 24/7/365 so i won't bother reading one word of your "scholarly works" & would not poison my body by wiping my arse on them.

i don't hate GLBT people, have many gay friends, who also do NOT want either gay marriage or adoption of children.

Imacentristmoderate, what a particularly nasty piece of work you are. I wouldn't lower my standards to reply to any of your awful statements.
No wonder you enjoy the company of your equally charming comrades Runner, OTB and ttbn.

With the terrible mental health problems of several adoptees I know, I am sure that the decisions of women these days to opt for abortion rather than adoption is often a better choice.
We should be working towards preventing unwanted pregnancies in the first place, rather than going back to the good 'ol days of forcing women to go through pregnancy, labour and adoption against their will.

Contraception or abstinence are 2 good methods.
Another way to lessen the numbers of 'accidental' pregnancies is to ensure any unwanted babies are born and given straight to the daddies to raise alone.