Imacentristmoderate,

Don't waste your time waiting for any rational responses from her, mate. I don't even glance at her ratbaggery any more. Since the loss of the other one, Foxy, she has gone to the top of my idiot list.

Iameitheralefietrollingoruttlerydelusional,

When you can keep up with a discussion and not resort to conspiracy, I’ll take you a bit more seriously.

<<You'd also need to demonstrate that your radical, extreme, left wing religious cult is not a cult.>>

Why would I need to? The burden of proof still lies with you. A cult is a small, unpopular religion; just as a religion is a large, popular cult.

ttbn,

I have not committed the ad hominem fallacy. An ad hominem is the use of personal attacks to redirect the focus of a discussion to the person instead of their arguments. This is what you’re doing. I, on the other hand, have demonstrated that your comments have been incorrect and then pointed out the obvious conclusion that they’re ignorant. That’s not an ad hominem.

<<...your favorites being 'homophobe', 'Islamophobe', 'racist', 'denier' or whatever tired old descriptions you think should work.>>

I don’t think I’ve ever called anyone on OLO an 'Islamophobe'. The only person I’ve called a racist here is someone who admits the fact and wears the label as a badge of pride. And I have only ever called someone a ‘homophobe’ and ‘denier’ when I could demonstrate the fact.

You’re just resorting to slander now.

Speaking of which, discrediting your arguments and calling them out for what they are is not bullying. You have revealed nothing about me and have only done yourself a disservice by resorting to personal attacks. I’m sorry that your logic and reasoning flopped, but that says nothing about me. Your response to the fact does, however, reflect on badly on you.

Suseonline,

You are the forum's oft-acknowledged No1 expert on gays and tireless spruiker for all things gay, particularly anal sex(!), having introduced the subject to threads where it was not even imagined to be relevant.

You have said that your passionate obsession with gays stems from when you and other women in your family recognised from birth the gay sexuality of a boy relative, and ensured that he was groomed accordingly.

You have always sidestepped and steered away from the subject of lesbanism though, declaring your 'married' status, while constantly damning and warring against men.

Heh, heh, you are the strange one.

Anyhow, the adoption example you were looking for earlier is given below, but they are gay not religious. Here you go and it is odd that you forgot, the case being well publicised.

<Australian pair in L.A. convicted for making child porn with ‘adopted son’ from Russia

An Australian couple is accused of making hardcore child porn with their "adopted son" for an international porn syndicate known as the Boy Lovers network.

On Friday, Mark J. Newton, 42, was sentenced to 40 years in prison and was ordered to pay $400,000 in restitution to the child. His boyfriend, Peter Truong, 36, pleaded guilty and is awaiting sentencing.

The couple bought the child from his Russian mother for $8,000 in 2005.

Investigators say Newton and Truong flew the boy between Australia, the United States, France and Germany to record at least eight other pedophiles sexually abuse him.

They shared images and videos on their perverted network, which specialized in depictions of boys between 6 and 8 years old, federal prosecutors said.

"Personally … I think this is probably the worst (pedophile) rings ... if not the worst ring I've ever heard of," investigator Brian Bone of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service told Australia’s Seven News.

Newton addressed the U.S. federal courtroom in Indiana in shackles Friday. His voice quavered as he said, "being a father was an honor and a privilege that amounted to the best six years of my life.">
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/2-convicted-adopted-son-porn-article-1.1385895

Gays can be paedophiles, lesbians too.

Ima...none of your crazy links worked. What a pity...

After all this complete madness on this thread, I just want to say that Victoria got the adoption laws right.
AJ, I will leave you to it. There is no way you can reason with this lot....