The Forum > Article Comments > Palestine needs more straight talking and less doublespeak > Comments
Palestine needs more straight talking and less doublespeak : Comments
By David Singer, published 17/8/2015Those proponents of the two-state solution who continue to allow Abbas to maintain this rejectionist stance are actively contributing to its demise.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
You state:
"The Israelis got their foot in the door using WW2 and the leverage gained from the German holocaust against the Jews."
Wrong - the Jews got their foot in the door in 1920 after WW1 at the San Remo Conference and Treaty of Sevres and in 1922 when all 51 member Nations in the League of Nations unannimously endorsed the right of the Jewish people to reconstitute the Jewish National Home in Palestine under the Mandate for Palestine.
That is what the Jews have been legally engaged in doing since - managing to increase the Jewish population from 83790 in 1922 to 474102 in 1941 - despite the best attempts by the Arabs to prevent these Jews from entering Palestine to build up the Jewish Home in accordance with the above League of Nations decision.
The Arabs have never accepted that League of Nations decision favouring the Jews - even though the the Arabs ended up with 99% of the territory freed from Ottoman Empire rule after 400 years - which was granted to the Arabs under the Mandates for Syria and Lebanon and Mesopotamia - whilst the Jews got the remaining 1% under the Mandate for Palestine.
As a result there is now one Jewish State and 21 Arab States in the world.
Obviously you think that was a bad deal for the Arabs.
Coveting the one Jewish State as well - which would fit into Tasmania three times- is a pretty greedy and uncompromising position for the Arabs (with the notable exceptions of Egypt and Jordan) to seriously maintain. Don't you agree?
Is your support for the overwhwelming majority Arab position taken out of Jew-hatred or simply because you have swallowed Arab propaganda hook line and sinker - especially given the furphy raised by you in your above statement which I have pointed out is totally and unequivocally false?
Withdrawing that statement would show you are indeed prepared to reason and reconsider when confronted with facts that make your statement look really stupid.
Go for it