The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Sex slavery and the Islamic State > Comments

Sex slavery and the Islamic State : Comments

By Mark Durie, published 3/7/2015

In the fourth edition of its magazine Dabiq IS aggressively promoted sex slavery as an Islamic practice, arguing that the practice conforms to the teaching and example of Muhammad and his companions.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All
I watched enough of the video to glean the message/proposition Spencer is selling. Essentially the Quran is supposedly the direct word of God/Allah as received by the prophet Mohammed. But given the inconsistencies in the Quran as they were revealed by Mohammed it stands to reason Mohammed was making it up as he went along, so to speak, and therefore the Quran cannot be the actual words of Allah.

You say - "My modified belief, based on spiritual sources, is that indeed "such a Muhammad" as falsely described by the Hadith never existed, yet an actual saint by the name of 'Muhammad' in fact lived around that time (6th-7th century), who was the seed of rumours and came to symbolise the "ideal person".

So in other words, you have invented your own Muhammad, based on the work of someone who denies Muhammad ever existed and your spiritual sources, whatever those might be. You want it both ways, the not so perfect Muhammad that is credited with the Quran and who's life is told in the Hajith didn't really exist and therefore Islam is a sham; but you still believe a Great Prophet Muhammad existed, who only espoused the good verses you use to claim Islam is religion of peace.

Sorry Yuyutsu, that doesn't stack up.
Posted by ConservativeHippie, Friday, 3 July 2015 4:38:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This quote actually draws attention to a fundamental problem;

"for Muslims to enslave their captives was "a more humane and proper
way of disposing of them"' ... " their descendants produced great
scholars, imams, jurists, commentators, statesmen and generals of the
army.""

The main reason that Islamic armies kept captives is probably because
their genome is badly damaged and they knew that the captives were
cleverer than themselves and could do advanced studies and work that
they themselves with their lower IQ are unable to develop.

This is the result of their inbreeding custom of marrying cousins.
See NSW Government Hansard and Parliamentary report to House of
Commons by the UK Midlands National Heath Service.
It also might explains why there was a surge in science in Spain
during the occupation by the Moors.

The Australian taxpayer is now carrying the extra burden of dealing
with their children. The birth genetic defect rate is between 13%
and 18% greater than the host population.

It is this genetic problem which I believe is the cause of Islamists
to be unable to compromise in negotiations or have rigid beliefs.
A Danish doctor who has studied the problem believes their average
IQ is somewhere between 80 and 95.

If you have any doubt of this look up the number of Nobel Prize
winners of Arab or other Moslem nations. Compare to any European country.
Posted by Bazz, Friday, 3 July 2015 5:06:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Hippie,

What Spencer claims is not only that the Koran is not the words of Allah - but not even the words of Muhammad, peace be upon him.

I am not claiming that even the good words in the Koran are Muhammad's. All that was left from Muhammad was probably just vague rumours, then these rumours developed and became a popular theme to tell stories about, all kinds of stories - good and bad. At some stage, an evil militant gang collected those of the stories (a subset of about 3%) that it believed should serve their purposes - and that became what we now know as "Islam".
Posted by Yuyutsu, Friday, 3 July 2015 5:24:00 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yuyutsu, are there any references in Jewish histories to the attacks
on Jewish towns/villages near to Medina or other Islamic cities ?
Posted by Bazz, Friday, 3 July 2015 5:42:17 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"If a army of thugs waving Christian banners and spouting slogans from the Bible, threatened to kill all non-Christians, took over half a country, I'm sure they would be called extremist Christian terrorists."

No, they are called the US Army, Australian Army and UK Armies etc
Posted by Valley Guy, Friday, 3 July 2015 6:33:56 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What planet are you from Valley Guy?

Since when do the US, Australian and UK armies wave Christian flags and chant from the Bible. Fine if you want to be anti-West and/or anti-democracy, but at least get your facts half right.

I'm sure you love bending over to serve your ISIS brothers; perhaps they will teach you how to be a real man instead of a brainwashed paranoid stooge. Or are you planning to martyr yourself for ISIS in the near future.
Posted by ConservativeHippie, Friday, 3 July 2015 6:55:38 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy