The Forum > Article Comments > The risks of terror > Comments
The risks of terror : Comments
By Bill Calcutt, published 18/6/2015Remarkably, terrorism co-opts credulous authorities who need to constantly dramatize the magnitude and imminence of the threat in order to justify exceptional government actions to protect the community.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
Posted by Yuyutsu, Thursday, 18 June 2015 1:26:42 PM
| |
I have never read so much conspiratorial BS in my life.
David Posted by VK3AUU, Thursday, 18 June 2015 1:52:05 PM
| |
Hey Bill. You wanted a multicultural society and you have got it. Us "racists" tried to warn you that if you brought people into this country who's values and behaviours were diametrically opposed to our own, you would get trouble. And we tried to warn you that Islam was a dangerous and violent religion. But you did not want to know.
Now that the chickens have come home to roost you are complaining that our governments must repair the damage that people like you caused. Here is a few more little "benefits" of muliticulturalism, Bill. Armed guards outside of newspaper offices and Jewish schools. Six Sydney schools in the "troubled" (read "Muslim") Southwest of Sydney now have permanent security guards to protect teachers and students from violent students and violent parents. Granville Boys High requesting it's students to stop bringing knives to school. Australian soldiers, SES volunterrs and Rural fire Service volunteers advised to not wear their uniforms on duty to minimise the risk of being beheaded. Muslim men arrested and charged with conspiring to murder a police officer and use his gun to commit a massacre on ANZAC Day. African gangs in Dandenong out of control with the police advising residents to flee them on sight. The self declared head of the non existent "Aboriginal State" trying to board an overseas airliner on an "aboriginal" passport. And aborigines in North Queensland declaring their Yilindji tribal lands to be a "sovereign state." And aborigines in NSW doing the same thing claiming thing declaring a "Murrawarri Republic." We have 'aboriginal courts" handing out "aboriginal punishments" (including spearings) We have aboriginal leaders demanding "aboriginal only" seats in Federal parliament and Sheik al Hilaly doing the same thing in NSW in the State parliament. Demands by aborigines that the Federal government continue to fund remote and totally dysfunctional aboriginal communities to the tune of 480,000 dollars p.a. which would be shut down if they were white communities. Posted by LEGO, Thursday, 18 June 2015 3:00:10 PM
| |
Hi Yuyutsu
Re your comment: "greedy media and the government's greedy security industry are colluding between them, perhaps even with the criminals themselves?" Definitly the Media - a bunch of "if it bleeds it leads ambulance chasers" Lawyers need crims. Doctors the sick. Politicians the gullible. Plastic surgeons help the needy to - most commonly "flat" chested http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/feb/03/uk-plastic-surgery-2013-most-popular Posted by plantagenet, Thursday, 18 June 2015 8:18:43 PM
| |
...Cont
“You, dear insouciant, stupid, American (to all Westerners) are back on the Plantation. Perhaps that is your natural home. In his masterful A People’s History of the United States, Howard Zinn documents that despite their best efforts the exploited and abused American people have never been able to prevail against the powerful private interests that control the government. Whenever in American history the people rise up they are struck down by brute force. Zinn makes totally clear that “American freedom, democracy, liberty, blah-blah” are nothing but a disguise for the rule over America by money. Wave the flag, sing patriot songs, see enemies where the government tells you to see them, and above all, never think. Just listen. The government and its presstitute media will tell you what you must believe. “ More evidence of Police State America: http://www.globalresearch.ca/notes-on-police-violence-in-america-police-shoot-and-kill-two-teenage-girls-within-two-weeks/5428432 Why are there UN troops in the USA. FEMA camps. All truth is only on the net. There is no real news in our controlled media Murdoch Zionist press. You have to ask why is he so bent on controlling media worldwide. Or are you just plane naïve. Obama's mentors were Commies. Hippy - you think that JFK speech was rubbish? Federation of American Scientists https://fas.org/ https://fas.org/sgp/secrecy.html https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2015/04/oversight-113/ Interview with Paul Craig Roberts (http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/) By Costantino Ceoldo “I recently had the chance to interview Paul Craig Roberts. I remember briefly, for the uninitiated, that Dr Roberts was a senior official of the US govt, economic advisor to the President during the first term of Ronald Reagan. It is to him that credit goes for creating Reaganomics, the economic policy initiated by Reagan to revive the US economy, then stagnant. Dr Roberts was also a member of a secret committee of control over the CIA, set up to verify the information provided by US intelligence on the continuation of the Cold War with the Soviet Union (current good guys). He has still now a profound understanding of the mechanisms of power in Washington and he’s distinguished for his political analysis, often discordant compared with that of the official mainstream. Cont... Posted by Constance, Friday, 19 June 2015 1:05:45 PM
| |
CC: In one of your recent articles you said that there is an “establishment” within both the Republican Party and also the Democrats voted to preserve the power and hostility toward any independent and authoritative presidential figure. How is it that we have come now to a situation like this and it seems to have originated many decades ago?
Dr Roberts: Its ability to tax, borrow and print money gives the govt command over private resources. The beneficiaries of these resources can be, in certain circumstances, the people. More often, the beneficiaries are the profits of private interests who are allied with the govt. As time passes these interests harden and become an Establishment. In the US the Establishment consist of the private interest groups – such as the financial sector, the military/security complex, the Israel Lobby, the extractive industries and agribusiness – that write the laws that govt enacts. The political party in-groups serve these interests in exchange for the large political campaign donations that elect the govt. The two political parties in the US compete to be the whore of the private interest groups, because the majority party can do more favours and thus receive more benefits. (See Brit historian, Gibbons who wrote the “Decline of the Roman Empire” – and the corruptness of man). When political outsiders, such as Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, who can be tolerated as long as they are limited to governships in States, seize the presidential nomination for the Establishment candidates and get elected, they jeopardize the establishment’s control. For example, when the Democratic Establishment realised that Franklin D Roosevelt would not survive his 4th term, they forced out his popular vice president, Henry Wallace, and installed the non-entity and easily controlled Harry Truman. They were able to use Truman to create the very profitable Cold War, which kept the military/security complex in the money for years. Cont... Posted by Constance, Friday, 19 June 2015 1:10:15 PM
|
Is it possible that the greedy media and the government's greedy security industry are colluding between them, perhaps even with the criminals themselves?