The Forum > Article Comments > Would a widespread right to carry arms make a community safer? > Comments
Would a widespread right to carry arms make a community safer? : Comments
By Everett Themer, published 12/3/2015Advocates of Right to Carry laws tout study after study, all claiming to prove that enacting these laws has reduced and prevented crime across the country.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
You fall into the same category as IS MISE, if either of you wanted a F/A's licence, and I was in licencing, you'd both have the thing in two minutes flat ! Regrettably there are many others out there in the big wide world, who don't share the same qualities as you and he does. You've both had extensive military training, very experienced in the safe handling of F/A's, possess good sound social maturity and judgement, etc !
But we both know there are many fundamental 'nut jobs' in our society, and I personally wouldn't want them anywhere near even a simple toy 'pop gun', let alone something equally innocuous, like a smooth bore 'Crack a Jack' .177 Air Rifle ? Something you and I and every other kid around, 10 or 12 years could've purchased new, for about 27/6 or even 30/- back in the early fifties.
Mate, I don't know what the answer is, many of our younger folk are becoming crazier as time goes by ? Just look what's happening to some of our young Muslim people ? Somehow, they're becoming radicalised, all rather conveniently in my view, then they're off to Syria or some other place nearby, to have their silly heads shot off, and the rest as they say is history.
Just enjoy practicing your 'turn in's' and 'apexing' as you dash through some of those tight mountain roads, with the top down in your 'super charged' V12 sports car ! Many of these people who are so ardently and vehemently against F/A's in the community, don't really understand the problem in my opinion ? When they're in the hands of criminals, that's the problem. Not the licit market, it's the illicit market, that's the predicament, always the criminal element ? So why punish the licenced shooter ? It makes no sense at all ?