Its simply called "Reverse Racism" Saying if a non reflective calls me a White C#*^t in the Mall in Darwin because I didn't give them $2.00... its ok, and nothing happens - but if I call the same person a Black C#*^t, then I am discriminatory and inciting racial hatred. Same with a Zionist, same with a Muslim, Lavender Mafiaso etc etc. PC gone mad, multiculturalism for the sake of itself, & so accordingly the left handed basket weavers, purple scaled virgins and their ilk have had it, and still get it their way and we duffers let ourselves get pineyappled with Al Grasby, Good old Gough and the multi-cultural land rights for gay whales crews who cascaded down from there un-lubricated, unwashed, and in abundance.

18 c repeal is nothing more than a smoke screen from the Fascist Crown Government and as another poster said more of the status quo - divide & conquer. They are doing it very nicely under the radar, shortly we are likely to see rammed through in dead of night with marathon sittings of parliament, new terror laws, surveillance laws and removal of the right to silence and many common law protections gone forever.

The bench of the High Court is now of course stacked with LNP lackies, & I lament the retirements of Gummow & Kirby, who at least if only for their humanity, kept a lid on some of their more judicially activist friends in the later (current) bench.

Individual,
North Western European (occidental)societies are based on morality and personal reputation, not blood ties or ancestry, there's no such thing as "Racism" as far as we're concerned.
The idea of "Racism" comes from the orient, from a Jewish revolutionary named Trotsky who coined the term to describe his Slavic nationalist enemies, it's not a trait found in the West.
It's complicated and I'm not going to waste much effort refuting such a stupid article as this but Occidental people now see "Racism" as immoral and something they associate with criminals and thugs.
White people who bother other commuters on public transport or act up in public get a bad reputation and can be brought into line with the type of shaming tactics we've seen employed of late.
Contrast the response of the most recent train rant woman from Gosford with the African girl who falsely accused a Melbourne restaurant of racial discrimination, the former took her lumps and apologised, the latter was posting nonsense on facebook until the restauranteurs threatened to sue her.
Whites can be easily shamed into correcting their behaviour by threats to their good reputation, non Whites can't, they operate on a different level.

Albie,
Oh I'd love to get up in court and put the Holocaust on trial,even though I accept most of the facts about Operation Reinhard I'd even make a complaint against myself like the German revisionists do just to make trouble for the PC brigade.
The problem is that when they make some speech illegal the dissenters can then call the shots by tailoring their speech to trigger complaints and force the state into certain actions.
If something is illegal the state has to act upon it and the trial has to be public and fair, they can't just send it to mediation.
What happens then is that on controversial issues like the Holocaust the state either has to strip defendants of their civil rights and forbid them from defending themselves as they do in Germany or decline to prosecute so the whole system breaks down.
The reason the Anti Whites want 18c retained is because it gives them more options and more flexiblity in suppressing their enemies, if they had to get up in court and back the things they say and write on the internet they'd be in real trouble.

I have lived the greater part of my life amongst racists who claim discrimination at the drop of a hat if a non-indigenous & not necessarily white has a slip of the tongue & says something uncomplimentary but true nevertheless.
I have no real problem with them as such but I have an extreme objection to australian bureaucrats who bum-lick these people at every given moment for their own opportunity to get access to the funding trough provided by ignorant Labor Governments & their cronies in the public service.

Expressing your grievances in an acceptable way is a fundamental requirement for acceptance in civilised society. Those who haven't learnt how to do it yet should not be punished -- but they certainly shouldn't be rewarded.

Just a note to help some connect the dots:

When you vote for the Greens and other left whinge parties you are endorsing the article writers "thinking".