The Forum > Article Comments > Shaw about that? > Comments
Shaw about that? : Comments
By Debbie Garratt, published 9/5/2014Victorian Liberal MP Geoff Shaw raises some interesting issues with regard to abortion, engendering the usual hysterical outbursts from radicals only concerned about the availability of abortion.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
So if we had artificial womb technology, there'd we no justification for abortion.
Can another "part" of your body ever exist independently?
Can your arms just wander off and never come home?
Why do think women have miscarriages?
Because their body doesn't recognise this tissue as its *own*, and her immune system attacks it.
So the baby can't survive alone in the early phase.
That somehow gives you the right to destroy it?
I don't see the logic there.
Human babies can't "survive" without assistance for many months, even years after birth.
Should we allow post-birth "terminations", since the baby/infant can't be self-sufficient and is therefore a burden on someone's time and finances?
Mother charged with murder of infant triplets.
Acquitted! They were a "burden" and threat to her mental health.
individual "hundreds of thousands of small children suffering" in poverty.
In Australia?
With a welfare system available to all?
If children suffer, it's because of their parents' actions, not do-gooders.
I suppose do-gooders shouldn't be concerned about other people's children drinking industrial waste or breathing in toxic pollution either.
Mind your own business!