‘imajulianutter loudly proclaims there is no invasion because the army has stopped at the Rhine’

I can find no reference to Chamberlain making any such announcement about any armies stopping at the Rhine.
Chamberlain became PM in 1937.
The British PM at the time of Germany’s re-militarisation of the Rhineland in 1936 was Stanley Owen. I cannot find any such announcement by him about any armies stopping at the Rhine either.

It was only Hitler who made any announcement anything like your claim, after his armies re-militarised the Rhineland and had crossed the Rhine.

"First, we swear to yield to no force whatever in the restoration of the honor of our people, preferring to succumb with honor to the severest hardships rather than to capitulate. Secondly, we pledge that now, more than ever, we shall strive for an understanding between European peoples, especially for one with our Western neighbor nations...We have no territorial demands to make in Europe!...Germany will never break the peace."

Adolph Hitler
March 7 1936.
After Germany’s re-militarisation of the Rhineland after her armies crossed the Rhine.
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/triumph/tr-rhine.htm

Steeleredux, I believe you unwittingly, compared me to your socialist mass murdering hero Adolph Hitler.
Now apologise for your witlessness.

Lol yep I’m laughing at you.

Nutter
Quote
¨You know increasing DTR, expanding ice caps, stable or falling surface temps and extreme weather events more easily explained in terms of cooling rather than warming¨.

And I my opinion there is absolutely no evidence for the above claims try an internet search the various subjects but please stick to reputable sites such as universities, governments or science organisations. Not some of the wacky sites we so often see referred too on this forum.

I can´t tell how offensive I find the term ¨warming terrorist¨, My family basically lost our business due to environmental vandals who´s only interest was short term gain. My father managed two salmon lakes in the west of Ireland, until fishermen using nets measured in kilometers discovered they could catch the Salmon off the coast of Greenland during their annual migration. They simply cleaned the place out. Some 20 plus men directly or indirectly employed on the lakes lost their jobs as a result, plus several thousand more in other parts Ireland.

I am well aware how dependant we have become on fossil fuels but we now have the capacity to reduce our need to use them by a massive amount. The only thing stopping us is those fools who chose to ignore the obvious evidence that we are causing a problem of truly global proportions. Let us be clear some 90% of the data clearly point to the fact that greenhouse gases and aerosols are having a potentially disastrous effect on climate. The remaining 10% is simply not clear, we don´t understand, or just plain wrong, but that does not stop an army of fools from pouring over the 10% and claiming it proves there is no problem.

Well said warmair, this thread is populated by spin doctors, set to discourage sensible comment.

Dear imajulianutter,

Lol mate.

I did not set out to be completely historically accurate in my analogies.

What I have objected to is the author of this piece being called a liar, people at the BOM being called corrupt, and those who oppose your mindset being called terrorists.

You bleat again “why is it that you haven't been able to refute my opinions?”, because they are just that my friend, opinions. You have furnished no facts, no sources, no citations, no links, nothing!

So when I haven't responded you have stamped your little feet saying I have “ignored” and “omitted" you, in other words 'give me some attention now or I will tell the headmaster'.

Time to grow up.

warmair: "...this thread is populated by spin doctors, set to discourage sensible comment."

This applies to the entire forum.

Steelee.

FIRSTLY

You open your mouth and you confirm your witlessness.

‘I did not set out to be completely historically accurate in my analogies.’

Then it would be reasonable to assume you use the same inaccuracy producing methodology in all your pronouncements... including those pertaining to warming.

SECONDLY

Terrorist; noun
2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others.

Now give me a dictionary definition of Denialist and take in the views contained in current reports IPCC and NASA August Polar photos as well as the simple maths required to calculate the DTR.

THIRDLY

‘David
We agree.
The climate is changing.
...
How do we decide who is accurate?

Lets see:
A. NASA photos show expanding ice caps in summer.
B. The IPCC now acknowledge surface temps are not increasing according to their models.
C. Statistics show irrefutably the DTR is increasing dramatically.
D. Well I don't know if extreme weather events are increasing but all the warmists say they are. But temps are no higher than they used to be and there haven't been any cyclones in Qld this year. The warming terrorists at the BOM predicted 12. That means there needs to be more than 1 a week for the next 10 weeks. (Oh and now 9 weeks left therefore more than 1 a week.)
My cooling terrorists claim there would be none.
(Some warmist terrorists got caught in expanding ice this Antarctic summer.)

Please respond without abuse as we both share the view climate is changing. It is just we see the change dramatically opposite.

Please state your case for warming in light of the emerging facts.
Posted by imajulianutter, Thursday, 16 January 2014 6:47:45 PM’

Steelee, simple research will confirm my claims? Oh but that’s right see FIRSTLY above.

LOL REALLY LOUD BELLY LAUGH LOL

FINALLY

Your intellect is such that you think you can use as excuse inaccurate factual witlessness in defending unwitting denigration.
You are wrong. FACT you witlessly compared me to Hitler not Chamberlain.

Show some courage and accept your witless error, its consequences and apologise.

Come on steelee be adult.