anyhow
here is an example of non-violent change
never ever never..any but..ever passive..change..for cause of course

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6040&page=0

The comments by UOG are intelligible and the comments by Runner about Lyn verge on, or in fact are, defamatory.

On a couple of occasions I have stepped out of line and been stood on and I deserved to be!

Come on, Graham, apply your rules fairly and equally!

My apologies, Graham, I used the word Runner when I should've used the word Hasbeen. Occasionally I can't tell the difference between them.

Please forgive me!

Another Mea Culpa! I meant to say 'unintelligible'.

They say that 'age shall not weary them.'

They lied!

<<Another Mea Culpa!>>

NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Absolutely no more cupas for you tonight.
Judging by the last three posts, you've drunk enough for one night

let me explain..my previous post

<<..yeah peace man
[what about john and joko?]

bag it girl>>

if you will recall..john and joko..held a bag in/protest
they were right into activism..[recall..[who could forget]..their bed in?

i wondered if that was intelligible
maybe not..but im peeved..i thought we were remembering gandi
for good or ill.he resisted tax..cause its a lie..think how he fought JUST ONE TAX..we now got over 200..[thats what lobby achieves..whjen they lobby

and to lobby..on..anne frank
and two murdered heroes..who did too have human failings

well thats just sick..[and im sorry to have to say that]..too

BY ALL..MEANS REMEMBER GHANDI*

BUT..
if your really writing..
'cause you care'..more about the other issues on..page two/three

[i cant help but feel betrayed]
it just conforms with..too many other tricks..*used to bring IN..the *new tax

GHANDI too..WOULD RESIST..get it?
he marched..for NO..TAX..

have some respect
for our dead.