The Forum > Article Comments > Life on the line: can humanity survive? > Comments
Life on the line: can humanity survive? : Comments
By Robert Burrowes, published 2/10/2013Can we finally acknowledge the truth of the pervasive threats to human survival and act non-violently in response to this truth?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
-
- All
>>Well that's nice isn't it, as my grandma used to say.<<
One of her favourites was, "if you can't say anything nice, Pericles, it's better you don't say anything at all".
So, with apologies to grandma...
There are so many false notes in this article, it's a cacophony.
"...one challenge we face is to celebrate his life in a way that Gandhi himself would have found meaningful. Gandhi was not a man of token gestures."
Which presumably means that it is beholden upon us to make a non-token gesture.
And the best we can come up with is this?
"'The People's Charter to Create a Nonviolent World' invites people and organisations to consider publicly declaring their commitment to work to end human violence by signing an online pledge".
So everyone, stop playing Candy Crush Saga, and sign that online pledge. That sort of non-token gesture should sort it once and for all, and allow you to feel at one with Ghandi. After all...
"The Nonviolence Charter has been signed by many great people, even if you have never heard of them."
It's ok, I'll stop now. It's just that after many years of study, I can safely be assured of three things in this world. One, is that we are all going to die at some undefined point in the future. Two, that mankind will also cease to exist in a recognizable form, at some undefined point in the future - quite possibly in the next few hundred years, well before our sun turns into a white dwarf. And three, that mankind is chemically disposed to live in conflict.
Always has been, always will be.
But go ahead, knock yourselves out and sign the charter, if it makes you feel all warm inside. It is of course a completely honourable gesture of utter futility, but hey, the world needs earnest and well-meaning people. They will, of course, never have greater force than the mean and nasty folk. Simply because they are not mean and nasty.