The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Cruise missile targeting of Syria > Comments

Cruise missile targeting of Syria : Comments

By Peter Coates, published 29/8/2013

The US and allies seems almost certain to use cruise missiles against the Syrian regime, but what can they sensibly target?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 23
  11. 24
  12. 25
  13. All
Loudmouth, Rhrosty,

yes it may be all over in a few hours, on TV at least. Never mind the poor people of Syria who will after a interminable period of destabilisation become poorer and more isolated than before the regime change instigated by the West.

Then following this catastrophe, you will see an Iranian revolution, one that is of course instigated by the US, Israel and its minions, again to the detriment of peace and stability in the ME.

Where does all this lead..........back to the White House, the Military Industrial Complex, Israel and its greater ME hegemonic dreams and of course the death of millions of innocent people.

The old saying 'better the devil you know, rather than the one you don't' clearly comes to mind.

It makes one wonder what the real agenda is, I would suggest it would be energy and curtailing Chinese and Russian power against a declining US power world-wide.
Geoff
Posted by Geoff of Perth, Thursday, 29 August 2013 8:44:15 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Iran has just said it will bomb the crap out of Israel and Syria says likewise if it is attacked. Our Western War Mongers have totally lost it.
Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 29 August 2013 9:35:40 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A London security consultant, Dan Kaszeta, formerly of the US Army's Chemical Corps, is currently compiling, from sources publicly available from crime scene reports and footage and a study of the use, properties and effects of war chemicals, a reconstruction of the false flag chemical attack in Damascus[1]. His objective is not to try to deduce the origin of the attack, but his forensic observations point to what we are being told as being a crock. His evolving reconstruction is written in very clear language and is consistent with the agent being a cocktail of chemicals, without significant quantities of sarin and possibly without including any other nerve poisons.

Kaszeta outlined his interim observations and conclusions in an interview with Timur Moon of International Business Times[2] and has updated them since [3]

For anyone seeking to evaluate the events knowledgeably and to penetrate the relentless pressure of official talking heads (especially ABC/BBC/Aljazeera TV) to cut the information selectively to steer the reader towards the call of the PNAC’s dogwhistle, an hour or so exploring the Strongpoint Security website [1] would amply repay the effort.

[1] http://strongpointsecurity.co.uk/resources/syria/

[2] http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/501313/20130825/syria-chemical-weapons-damascus-tear-gas-jobar.htm

[3] http://strongpointsecurity.co.uk/site/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Revised-Thoughts-on-Damascus.pd
Posted by EmperorJulian, Thursday, 29 August 2013 10:16:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Arjay,

I don't know, you left-wingers are so transparent !

You reveal so much of yourself when you assert that

'There is no conclusive proof who used the Sarin gas. The USA Banking Military Industrial Complex finds countries to liberate who refuse to be slaves to their imperialism.'

Gosh, so impartial !

And who are the war-mongers in your scenario: "Iran has just said it will bomb the crap out of Israel and Syria says likewise if it is attacked."

Do you mean peace-loving Iran and Syria ? And why Israel, which, for all its supposed faults, has not actually attacked Syria ?

So are you saying that the Syrian regime has the right to stop any investigation of the use of chemical weapons, at least for five days, but is not responsible for this terrible war-crime, and is actually peace-loving ? That it can attack Israel, and be peace-loving ? And that Iran, out of nowhere, can attack Israel and still be peace-loving?

What the weather like on your planet ?

Left-whingers ! You gotta laugh !

Cheers :)

Joe
Posted by Loudmouth, Thursday, 29 August 2013 11:39:47 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Loudouth you fool, I'm not left or right wing. This is about survival of the planet. If being left means I don't want a nuke war, I hope billions become aware.The Joint Chiefs of staff Gen Martin Dempsey has warned against an attack on Iran because of the possible serious consequences

The Banking Military Industrial Complex are seeing their dreams of a NEW WORLD ORDER evaporate, so they are desperate and are willing to bluff Russia/China with a nuke war. The West has already used mini nukes,so using the big nukes are just an academic exercise.

Our neo-cons have increasing public awareness of their crimes, a collapsing &700 trillion derivative scam, with Russia, China, Iran Syria forming an alliance to take them on,WW3 will happen if people like you don't awaken.
Posted by Arjay, Friday, 30 August 2013 6:50:37 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What some unenlightened refer to as western war mongers are really nothing more than a bunch of people concerned about the future of our Nations. The mad out there need to be curbed every now & then from destroying everything from peoples' hopes to our environment. By hitting the mad those who are out to rectify the madness are then called war mongers.
Those oil fires lit by the mad aren't as environmentally friendly as some may believe. If the mad didn't get so much support from their mad allies then there wouldn't be a need for conflict. Those who condemn the so-called war mongers of the Wets should start thinking as to what would happen to them if those war mongers didn't act. Just look at Australia's boat people situation & how it got out of hand because the anti war mongers got their way.
Just imagine if the boat crowd decides to bring weapons ?
Posted by individual, Friday, 30 August 2013 7:40:04 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 23
  11. 24
  12. 25
  13. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy