thank you percules

i been..holding back..from putting this
to peter..publicly or private

TO PETER*
pass onto pappa

the writing..
put up publicly..on the wall..here
when you ignored the letter of ross kelly[7]..call

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5995&page=0

>>ps.i know the/bible?..has some extra/writers..
not included..in other sects/creeds/translations>>>..

no doudt..peter..[papa1/2]..
these texts,,are..in the Vatican library
isnt it time..the father..*opened up the files..publicly..[online]

i wrote then..
that i had..*in mind..

<<..i would will..to find..them..>>
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=missing+bible+text
http://archive.org/stream/LostBooksOfTheBible/LostBooksOfTheBible_djvu.txt

well..that was informative
but..a dead/end*

but..found better
http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/lbob/index.htm
http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/lbob/

ok..im going in>>

where are the facts?
all..the christ sects..teachings are sacred
mary baker eddie/swedenberg/luther wesly..morman
EVEN THE KORAN..

its time they were connected..EXPLAINED..clarified

declare all messengers saints
re unite christs broken house..first*
then rebuild the fathers house..in total..then rebuild the best*

anyhow..we beginit here
with you..or without you

<<after..two/..disappointing links..

http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/lbob/lbob17.htm

<<.. I am full of joy,..hoping the..rather to he saved;
inasmuch as I truly see a spirit infused..*into you*.. from the pure fountain..of God:

4.Having this persuasion,..and..by being fully convinced..thereof,
because..that since I have begun to speak..unto you,..I have had a more than ordinary..good success..
..*in the way of..the law..of the/Lord which is..*in Christ.

5..For which cause/brethren,
I also think verily..that I love you..above my own soul:
.because..&that there-in*..dwelleth*...the greatness of faith and charity,..as also the hope..of that life which is to come.

6...Wherefore considering this,
that if I shall take care..to communicate to you
a part..of what I have received,..it shall turn to my reward,

Dear Pericles,

<<Personally, I find one under god's commentary on Peter Sellick's articles equally as insightful as the piece itself.>>

I'll have to believe you on this one. Unlike myself you have a promising talent in philology and cryptology, as well as the patience of an elephant.

i wondered why you stopped comment..yu
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15257&page=0

anyhow

dear peter
please note..guidance is needed

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5984&page=0

idont know this stuff
thats your specialty

thanks chris

we all*..
have a bit..of the secret
but one..has more power..here

here i put up
a link to your topic here

will you deny him..too?
if he dare come?..back to where he ran from?

i wrote him..<<..[im putting..loving pressure..on him..>

you
the three peters!

asking you..3..

..<<to forget big words..
and just to speak..>>..or simply show your listening..[care]

<<..under law..notice to servant..via [peter]
is notice to master..unto..[the two peters]

he should reply..
your informative info
in fact i will repost this at HIS thread
to reveal his duty to truth/clarity/charity..etc

<<I think he was the Bishop of Rome
then..>>see previous post

but mate..i dont know creed stuff
just guided to..what to know/learn or quote

<<..and there were 2 Popes..>>

funny how we again..now
got two popes too>>>

if not listening..with your heart
listen to chris..father

please give answer
sir

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15257&page0

by johannine

anyhow
im over my..4 posts..at your latest thread
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15467&page=0

but wish..you to..
either..back-up..OR REFUTE*

this posted
here
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15257&page=0

i will repeat it here
so you can claim deny-ability..of ever having read it

anyhow

re/quote

Mathew/28/ atheist/commentary
http://atheism.about.com/od/biblegospelofmark/a/dating.htm

http://atheism.about.com/od/biblegospelofmark/a/mark12d.htm

<<..Mark was written..
in an environment..where Roman rule..was a constant presence...>>

<<..There are many clear signs that Mark..
*has gone to great lengths..to absolve Romans of the responsibility..for Jesus’ death — even to the point of painting Pontius Pilate..as a weak, indecisive leader rather than the brutal tyrant..that everyone knew him to be.>>

my point..
in quoting this..is to point out
that which was..first written..by say Matthew..

ENDING..at 28;7..
<<..[now i have told you]>>

but also notice..the later edit..
post script..by same auther
at 28;10..

..<<..JESUS said;,,edit
<<..go tell my brothers*..>>

GO TELL..my..BROTHERS

now lets examine..
the OTHER word..used..[disciple]

first/used..in 28;12..
by the..elders..meet/with..the priests
to fake/up things..via saul/paul..to seduce it's personal witness..[gospil].. into pauline creed

[the word..THEY used..was disciples..
NOT the word..jesus used.."brothers*..[28;10]

ok

back to the athiest link

<<..Instead of the Romans,
Mark’s author.,.lays the blame with the Jews —
primarily the leaders..but also to the rest of the people..to a certain* degree.>>

most certainly

<<..This would have made things much easier for his audience. Had the Romans discovered a religious movement focused upon a political revolutionary executed for crimes against the state, they would have clamped down much harder than they already were doing.>>

or rather paul/saul..*was doing
hushing up the christ..still living..[in spirit]
watching/karma..as saul..by turning brothers into...disciples

its basic balance
dualism..to allow freewill

see gone west
or 30 years among the dead pdf's

<<..As it was,
a religious movement..
focused upon on obscure Jewish prophet
who broke a few irrelevant Jewish laws thus..could be largely ignored..when there weren’t direct orders..from Rome to increase the pressure.>>

because saul..
[christs mortal-enemy]..
was on..the job*..despoiling matts gospel[witness]

creating creed*..
by creating disciples*..
WHERE clearly..christ..*only had...BRR-other..ie brothers*

no bother brother

Posted by one under god,
Friday, 13 September 2013 9:34:08 AM
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15257&page=0