The Forum > Article Comments > Australia and xenophobia > Comments
Australia and xenophobia : Comments
By Philip Machanick, published 25/7/2013What are the facts on 'push' and 'pull' factors for asylum seeker arrivals.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
-
- All
You did NOT answer the question.
Your statement was : <<Asylum seekers are not granted asylum in Australia without hard proof that they are in danger if they return home >>
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15265#263803
My question was: “What <<HARD PROOF>> were you talking about?
You attempted to side step it by presenting a series of links – none of which address your claim.
To go through those links:
Link 1 [from Yahoo] re ONE Afghani retrunee
Link 2 [ABC PM] re a small number of returnees
Link 3 [The Aust News Network] re The Sri Lankan FM disputing asylum seekers claims
Link 4 [Refugee Action Coalition] a puff piece from a lobby group.
Link 5[The Australian]re possible deportation of small group.
At best, your links relate to only a small number of rejectees.
The fact that we have rejected a small minority does not establish that the huge majority we accepted provided <<HARD PROOF>>
Since you cannot answer my question, let me answer it for you.
The vast majority of "asylum seekers" DO NOT present <<HARD PROOF>>
--They might have a mobile phone --but they have conveniently lost their papers/ID.
--They tell the same generic, rote learnt story (similar to the one you fed Loudmouth earlier in this thread)
--And as long as the names they give us don't appear on any wanted list they get given the benefit of the doubt and rubber stamped "found to be genuine".
And that is why we are such a popular destination: soft border controls, and not hard to get welfare for life.