The Forum > Article Comments > Facts favour nuclear-powered submarines > Comments
Facts favour nuclear-powered submarines : Comments
By Simon Cowan, published 5/11/2012The same process gave us the Collins Class; we don't need to repeat the mistake to know the likely outcome.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
-
- All
The reading this thread has encouraged me to do has enlightened me to the role that diesel powered subs have. Comparing diesel and nuclear is like comparing destroyers and aircraft carriers. Both have differing roles and capabilities.
Diesel subs are typically much smaller, about 1/6th of the cost and very effective in protecting specific assets where they can ambush targets. Whilst Nukes are faster and carry a much higher range of weapons and can be used to seek out and destroy targets and flee faster than any surface bound ship.
The question is then: Why on earth are we going to build these diesel subs ourselves when we can buy them at a fraction of the cost. If we can lease Nukes of the advanced Virginia class cheaper than building the diesels then there is something very wrong.