The Forum > Article Comments > Syria: on the road to ruin > Comments
Syria: on the road to ruin : Comments
By Graham Cooke, published 30/10/2012This is a war of attrition, and while these kinds of wars usually find a winner, the time frames can be measured in years rather than months or weeks.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
Posted by stevenlmeyer, Wednesday, 31 October 2012 9:06:13 PM
| |
CHERFUL
As I said, there's an "expert" for every occasion. Want to know how to attract Leprechauns? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxyofYuts04 Well, it's more fun than the 9 / 11 conspiracy fertiliser. Posted by stevenlmeyer, Wednesday, 31 October 2012 9:59:54 PM
| |
CHerful Re 911,you obiviously have not looked closely at the evidence.I've met the founder of http://www.ae911truth.org/ Richard Gage and also Prof Sten Jones ,Prof Neils Harrit and our Dr Frank Legge.Their team of 10 International scientists have found irrutable evidence of Nano Thermite throughout the dust and debris of 911.Their peered reviewed paper has not been disputed.
Nano Thermite in 2001 was only known to a few military on this planet.Very little was known about it. A rag tag bag of a few terrorists who could barely fly a Cessnor would not get their hands on this material. Here http://patriotsquestion911.com/ you will see 1000's of professional people asking the hard questions.Vladamir Putin there saying he warned the USA that these attacks were impending. BTW Woody Harrelson and Martin Sheen are starring in a New Film soon to be released called "September Morn" which will address most of your ignorance. Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 1 November 2012 6:53:24 AM
| |
Arjay- According to your linked article this is what these two particular experts based their opinions on.
Dan Barnham:- <Dan “knew” at the outset that something was fishy about 9/11, because both of the buildings Collapsed suddenly and in the same manner.> Dan McCoy:- <Most of his experience from 1965 to 1985 was in the design of steel-framed skyscrapers. The first of these was the 34-story headquarters for Pacific Gas and Electric in San Francisco, which was designed to resist the impact of an airplane and built at the same time as the WTC towers in New York. RE: the first experts reason for non belief-- < both buildings collapsing suddenly and in the same manner.> Picture two airplanes flying at 300km or more an hour going straight through the outside walls of the upper floors, as they did so, they destroyed most of the supporting structures in the outside walls Of both buildings at the same time. Not enough supports for the weight above and it was only a matter of time before these two buildings gave way and collapsed the way they did. This expert is wrong, because he based his opinion on the wrong belief that it was impossible for two buildings to collapse in the same way in such a short time of each other. There is no known basis for his belief because two planes have never been flown into two buildings like this in history so his opinion that it is not possible has no evidence to back it up. 2nd expert—bases his belief on the assumed( but never tested in real life) that the steel supports On the twin towers would withstand being hit by an airplane. When tested with the real thing they didn’t stand –end of story. Kind of like saying the Titanic was unsinkable until 6 of her engine rooms were damaged at the same time. The thing lacking in a lot of experts is common sense, they want to complicate something that is simple and staring them straight in the face, much like conspiracy theorists. Posted by CHERFUL, Thursday, 1 November 2012 4:22:46 PM
| |
Stevenlmeyer—
You are most correct in your assessment. It is truly astounding, what so called rational human beings will believe. It brings to mind the recent incident where a fellow declared himself to be Jesus and before long he had a group of followers. One of his followers (a woman), who was interviewed by a journalist, was university educated, a lawyer, if I remember correctly. I just shook my head in amazement, that someone with such an education could believe that this man was actually Jesus, alive here on Earth in the present day. It will be hard to find a rational solution to finding peace on earth when millions and millions of mankind is so ready to believe what some silly charismatic fool tells them. You could certainly sell some people the Sydney Harbour Bridge as a garden ornament for their fish pond. Well, at least you could sell it as a sacred site and a wailing wall, that wouldn't be to difficult. Posted by CHERFUL, Thursday, 1 November 2012 4:46:03 PM
| |
On the topic of Syria. You could correctly state that the illusion
and delusion of the different religious factions that have divided Syria into two separate tribes should take much of the responsibility for the present conflicts. Illusion and delusion, responsible for the lack of peace on earth. All religions are responsible for dividing countries, the Christian religion has certainly played it's part over the centuries. Posted by CHERFUL, Thursday, 1 November 2012 4:53:37 PM
|
It turns out there are "experts" to cater for every need.
Want to believe in 9 / 11 conspiracies - we have "experts" to bolster your belief.
Find evolution conflicts with your religion - we can find "experts" to comfort you.
Want to believe that the whole of climatology is a beat up - "experts" available, some with Ph.Ds.
"Scientific miracles" in the koran float your boat - "experts" on tap.
I can find UFO experts, experts who believe the moon is an alien space station, even a few experts who still believe smoking won't harm you.
You name it and we can find the "experts."
I'm thinking of starting a new business. You name your wacky belief and I'll find you an "expert" with a plausible story for whatever taurine fertiliser you want to believe.