The Forum > Article Comments > Asylum-seekers: we know what we want > Comments
Asylum-seekers: we know what we want : Comments
By Graham Young, published 30/7/2012Asylum-seekers arriving by boat might seem one of the most divisive political issues, but Australians, apart from the Greens and some on the ALP Left, actually agree on the bones of a common policy.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
Rudd’s stuffing around of Howard’s very effective asylum seeker policy was one of the stupidest and most inept political moves in the history of this country. And yet, he still looms as a likely leader and future PM !! !!
How can any thinking person possibly stomach this??
But I think Labor’s cause is not lost.
As I have said many times on OLO, what they need is to pretty profoundly reinvent themselves, and the way to do this is to get right away from Gillard, forget Rudd and bring someone new into the leadership, with the obvious person being Bob Carr.
They then need to embrace sustainability, which in the first instance requires a big reduction in the immigration rate.
And as far as asylum seeking and refugees go, they should simply put their misplaced pride aside and embrace Howard’s policies and implement mandatory detention, offshore processing and TPVs, and move to decisively shut down onshore asylum seeking.
At the same time, they should be espousing the big part that this country has always played in offshore refugee issues and the highest (or thereabouts) per-capita intake of refugees that we’ve accommodated for many years via our formal immigration program.
This should be increased somewhat and our international aid should be refined to deal more with refugee and sustainability issues.
If this is done well, Labor can convince most Australian citizens that we are indeed a highly compassionate country, that our precious aid money is being well-spent and that onshore asylum seeking will stop forthwith.
And Bob Carr, who is very knowledgeable in foreign affairs and sustainability issues, is just the person to do this!
What other alternative does Labor have?