The Forum > Article Comments > Porn hurts women, so say the partners of users > Comments
Porn hurts women, so say the partners of users : Comments
By Petra Bueskens, published 1/5/2012What is the relationship between use of pornography and the libido deficit of women, the purported mismatch among couples, and men's abiding sense of sexual frustration in marriage?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- ...
- 17
- 18
- 19
-
- All
When I said < Even “healthy” families are bound to succumb in a society devoted to peeling away the ideological layers in order to tap the (im)pure, incoherent desire within> I used inverted commas to indicate the “dubious” nature of “healthy” families—that is that their uprightness illustrates their credulous subscription to mores that are pure mythology. No family evolves its own morality, it partakes of “social” norms and morality, generally whether it complies or transgresses. Morality isn’t based on universals, but on cooperation and mutual benefits dressed-up as universals. Most of us don’t think this through because compliance is maintained and propagated much more effectively by fostering norms and taboos as God-givens—couching them in terms of “God’s law” and shrouding them in ritual. We don’t think them through, not because we can’t, but from force of habit, and because we dare not, more from existential than reverential fear, though we all suspend disbelief more or less. Earnest compliance is a marker of the subject’s naïve enthralment with all this, but it can’t be maintained, the personal battle between good and evil, if the family’s dissolute. Neither can Brady Bunch type families maintain the pretence if society’s dissolute, and this is what I meant, though I don’t use terms like dissolute and evil credulously. Libertarians will flatter themselves that porn is “freedom”, but the danger is that society requires ideology, not just for the sake of cooperation, but to maintain illusions of innocence, love, purpose etc.
As for the ladies the author here seeks to defend, with their laced-up moralities, inhibitions and sheer credulousness, they can’t possibly compete with porn-stars for the attentions of their men, who use sex as an outlet from stifling social convention. To this extent I agree that porn’s freedom, but really it’s just another order of compliance, commodified freedom based on exploitation.
Tony Lavis,
I don't believe paedophiles are a rare aberration; disturbingly, I think like rape it's potential in all men, it just wants the right circumstances and "freedom".