The Forum > Article Comments > Government creating a fatherless society > Comments
Government creating a fatherless society : Comments
By Warwick Marsh, published 15/3/2012Taxpayer funding for those who want to send the laws of nature into free fall.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
-
- All
Posted by JamesH, Saturday, 17 March 2012 7:58:05 PM
| |
Paul G said
""Warwick, you are obviously a homophobic bigot..... Homophobia pure and simple Saying that people who oppose same sex marriage are homophobic is also bigoted. In my view the argument presented is that radical feminism is using gays & marriage "equality" as part of its agenda to abolish gender difference by transforming its institutional source — the patriarchal family. susieonline said "Let's drag all those kiddies from one parent/house to another , week about, for the rest of their childhood, whether they are happy with that disruption or not" Yawn, the old "ping-pong" chestnut. The number of inter-home changeovers is the same for EOW and equal shared care - thanks rper1959 Sorry if the facts disagree with your mythology. If you're too stupid to engage in debate, then don't. I don't care if you're trying really hard etc… Posted by Howard Beale, Saturday, 17 March 2012 10:19:29 PM
| |
'If you're too stupid to engage in debate, then don't. I don't care if you're trying really hard etc…'
Charming... Howard Beale is resorting to insults when someone else (especially a female!) doesn't agree with his bitter anti-female rants. <"Yawn, the old "ping-pong" chestnut. The number of inter-home changeovers is the same for EOW and equal shared care" Really? Where are your stats for this statement? I was a child of divorced parents, and I currently know personally many children of divorced parents who do/did not enjoy living the old 'ping-pong' lifestyle at all. Isn't it true that as soon as most of these kids are old enough to really say what they want, they start refusing to move all the time? Or don't you know any of these kids Howard? Isn't your problem really with women who don't do as their told? The courts need to continue to do what is right for the children of each different family situation of the few separated parents that are bitter enough, or desperate enough, to go to family court to work out their problems. I very much doubt that this family court situation will change anytime soon, no matter how militant some minority groups become. Warwick Marsh is NOT a champion for divorced father's rights at all. He is a religious fanatic who wants to push his 'God given marriage for life, for all except Gay people' barrow. Posted by Suseonline, Saturday, 17 March 2012 11:44:52 PM
| |
Great article! It takes courage to speak up in our society when our society is so strangled by political correctness.
It is amazing that we have fallen so far that the rights of adults can be so centre stage that children barely are thought of in this debate. More than this though, traditional marriage connects fathers into their families. This builds security for husband, wife and children. Instead of playing games with re-engineering marriage, how about expending effort and dollars on building marriage up! Posted by az, Sunday, 18 March 2012 9:24:55 AM
| |
@Suseonline
One does not need a research study for simple arithmetic Alternate weekends (sole custody) or alternate weeks (equal shared care) require the same number of changeovers (two) every two weeks. Not that this perversion of a 60yo primary attachment theory has any veracity anyway. Children need emotional security, which comes from being able to love and be loved by both fit and loving parents, not the geographical stability of living in one house. “I was a child of divorced parents, and I currently know personally many children of divorced parents who do/did not enjoy living the old 'ping-pong' lifestyle at all”. Evidence is not important to you, then? Your personal experience and opinion is enough? DoH! “Isn't it true that as soon as most of these kids are old enough to really say what they want, they start refusing to move all the time?” No. If a child does reject a loved parent I suggest it is far more likely that he/she has been alienated – viz, their minds poisoned – against that parent. Strangely the family violence amendments removed the statutory protections, the so called “friendly parent” provisions, against this most insidious form of child abuse supposedly to protect children. “The courts need to continue to do what is right for the children of each different family situation of the few separated parents that are bitter enough, or desperate enough, to go to family court to work out their problems.” This is nonsense. The way the laws are designed it is clearly advantageous for mothers (and their lawyers) to protract and inflame the matter for a long as possible to force a family court decision. In the ridiculously anti-father biased courts a woman pretty much has to light up a crack pipe in a court room to not get the kids, the house, half the assets and a check every month Posted by Howard Beale, Sunday, 18 March 2012 1:42:05 PM
| |
@susieonline
you will no doubt enjoy the pain of these children whose vindictive mothers got their way http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-xgtAc2xaI&context=C4f6ef52ADvjVQa1PpcFO_v0uTuxEwKE6T4K_wr2SOjYoerZ7A6AQ= My ex repeated threatened me prior to separation with "I'll make sure you never see these kids again" , "I'll get custordy" etc etc i.e. she was socially abusive to me and our children, she followed up after separation with a false accusation of DV against me, and then co-opted the might of women's services and the corrupt family court, and wasted some $40,000 on a parasitic lawyer ,money that would have been better spent on our children. In spite of this 3 children have grown into descent self sufficient adults, and have a we have a good ongoing relationship, but will all carry immense psychologic harm, that was un necessary. I don't care who partners with who or what a persons sexual orientation but the feminist agenda has always been destruction of the traditional family the building block of stable society (by whatever means), and they (man hating radical feminists) must be stopped Posted by rper1959, Sunday, 18 March 2012 1:44:16 PM
|
>Ironically, Sue’s research also found that most of us are actually better at handling overt acts of discrimination than subtle insults, because at least the former has “no guesswork involved” whereas victims of microaggression are “often left to question what actually happened”.">
Whilst feminists are experts at pointing out the micro sexism of the male gender, they are not so welcoming to being confronted with their own micro-sexism.