Saltpetre,

I'm fast coming to the conclusion that my former assumptions concerning your good self were way off target.

Multiculturalism failure is largely produced by those lists of exemptions from multicultural and anti-multicultural policies.

Particularly exemptions government provides itself.

Australian government's support, promotion and practicing of racism does NOT support multiculturalism.

Australian government's support, promotion and practicing of racism does support racism, racists, totalitarians, opportunistic orators, and politicians.

Commonwealth's actions to qualify our rights and our responsibilities using racial identification as their tool continue.

Commonwealth ignores clear, repeatedly stated, intent of Australians with their Constitution to eliminate, to exclude, to prevent any and ALL legislation from qualifying our rights and or responsibilities using racial identification of Australians.

Yet the Commonwealth still segregates Australians using racial identification, still qualifies rights using racial identification.

Restrictions upon Australians within so many rural NT, SA, and WA, communities obvious examples.

So Australia's government and it's supporters right now preparing their promotions for another Constitutional amendment proposal to support their fraudulent claims of a Constitutional authority to practice racism in Australia upon Australians.

Soon to be screened using their current favorite flavor term "Indigenous".

The comment by Squeers & others about the lady in the UK being arrested
for flying the "English" flag. You all missed the point.
The English flag is not the Union Jack.
It is the red cross on a white field.

It was the cross that offended the neighbours.

The moslems seem to be very sensitive about anything that displays a cross.
Well tough + + +

I think the point about the red cross flag is that (i) either the story is completely made up or (ii) there was a lot more to the story.

David Jennings - I concur.

Saltpetre,

Please ignore my last post. Rather hypocritical of me to take a personal swipe after berating TAR for related issues in another thread.

Cheers

@Saltpetre:
thanks for the support - but there's no problem with dissent - that's healthy. It's also called freedom of speech - which is (not so) slowly being eroded by those on the multicultural/PC bandwagon.

@Squeers:
"Who are these immigrants who "make their adopted country change to suit them"? And what changes have been enforced?"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2019547/Anjem-Choudary-Islamic-extremists-set-Sharia-law-zones-UK-cities.html

is one instance - but not the only one.

"What gives the rednecks in my neck of the woods not only the right to fly their colonial flag, but to rise up in high dudgeon if the Aboriginal flag is flown, or any other flag?"
I have to disagree - it's called freedom - Wether you like the flag or not - you should be entitled to say what you like as long as it doesn't harm anyone - "precious" feelings aside.

as long as multiculturalism is forced on people it will not evolve - cultures will keep their bad aspects and not change.

"The UK just like Australia is multicultural and gave up its right to white supremacy when it imported negro slaves and colonised and exploited half the planet."

Hold on just one moment there - Slavery did not start with the white supremicist - that was actually the beginning of the end of slavery - so hate the white supremicist if you will, but at least hate the rest of the slave traders from the beginning of time as well and please don't forget where/who these white supremacists bought their slaves from - other African nations were selling their black brothers to all civilizations for many hundreds of years
http://www.english-online.at/history/slavery/slavery-history.ht